Asrock Z270M-ITX/ac

Performance Results


Gaming 58% Gunboat	Desktop 93% Nuclear submarine	Workstation 46% Yacht


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (75th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 25 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 87%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	62.2% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	72.6% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

High background CPU (22%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago. (Only the first run influences device rankings)

Motherboard	Asrock Z270M-ITX/ac (all builds)
Memory	13 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20161027
Uptime	3.9 Days
Run Date	Mar 23 '17 at 13:40
Run Duration	171 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	22%

Watch Gameplay: 1060-6GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing above expectations (75^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-7600K-$190 195,006 User benchmarks, average bench 76% CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 4.2 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (93^rd percentile)	87% Excellent	Memory 96 1-Core 132 2-Core 261 92% 163 Pts	4-Core 447 8-Core 472 61% 460 Pts	64-Core 442 27% 442 Pts
Poor: 59% ↑ This bench: 87% Great: 89%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117 1,368,019 User benchmarks, average bench 56% Asus(1043 85AE) CLim: 1974 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 378.78 Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	62.2% Good	Lighting 78.9 Reflection 78 Parallax 67.3 64% 74.7 fps	MRender 68.6 Gravity 73 Splatting 71.4 58% 71 fps
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 62.2% Great: 60%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
KINGSTON 240GB 1,204 User benchmarks, average bench 69% 145GB free (System drive) Firmware: 60AABBF0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing as expected (53^rd percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 95 95 7379250 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 8332236554372 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 65 (AB) Unknown 100 100 0 (AC) Unknown 100 100 0 (AE) Unknown 0 0 30 (B1) Unknown 0 0 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BD) vendor-specific 22 39 81606934550 (C2) HDA temperature 22 39 81606934550 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 120 120 7379250 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C9) Soft read error rate 120 120 7379250 (CC) Soft ECC correction 120 120 7379250 (E6) GMR head amplitude 100 100 100 (E7) Temperature 100 100 81604378624 (E9) Unknown 0 0 451 (EA) Unknown 0 0 452 (F1) Unknown 0 0 452 (F2) Unknown 0 0 387 (F4) Unknown 100 100 524289	72.6% Very good	Read 514 Write 237 Mixed 310 78% 354 MB/s	4K Read 17.6 4K Write 73.3 4K Mixed 21 92% 37.3 MB/s	DQ Read 189 DQ Write 250 DQ Mixed 54.5 87% 164 MB/s
Poor: 32% ↑ This bench: 72.6% Great: 93%
KINGSTON 240GB 1,204 User benchmarks, average bench 69% 84GB free Firmware: 60AABBF0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing above expectations (80^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 95 95 5079536 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 -57595511439228 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 64 (AB) Unknown 100 100 0 (AC) Unknown 100 100 0 (AE) Unknown 0 0 29 (B1) Unknown 0 0 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BD) vendor-specific 21 36 81606737941 (C2) HDA temperature 21 36 81606737941 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 120 120 5079536 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C9) Soft read error rate 120 120 5079536 (CC) Soft ECC correction 120 120 5079536 (E6) GMR head amplitude 100 100 100 (E7) Temperature 100 100 77309411328 (E9) Unknown 0 0 251 (EA) Unknown 0 0 290 (F1) Unknown 0 0 290 (F2) Unknown 0 0 148 (F4) Unknown 100 100 196609	83.9% Excellent	Read 515 Write 269 Mixed 350 83% 378 MB/s	4K Read 31.5 4K Write 88.4 4K Mixed 22 123% 47.3 MB/s	DQ Read 212 DQ Write 275 DQ Mixed 69.9 101% 186 MB/s
Poor: 32% ↑ This bench: 83.9% Great: 93%
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016)-$80 112,118 User benchmarks, average bench 92% 2.5TB free Firmware: CC26 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing above expectations (79^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 113 99 53288568 (03) Spinup time 96 95 0 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 177 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 253 80539 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 127 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 64 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BC) Unknown 100 100 0 (BD) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 82 61 303038482 (BF) G-sense error rate 100 100 0 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 9 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 100 100 423 (C2) HDA temperature 18 40 68719476754 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (F0) Head flying hours 100 253 82429012344860 (F1) Unknown 100 253 177594317 (F2) Unknown 100 253 14975144	106% Outstanding	Read 187 Write 182 Mixed 180 138% 183 MB/s	4K Read 0.76 4K Write 1.6 4K Mixed 0.23 87% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 60% ↑ This bench: 106% Great: 114%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$28 1,562,409 User benchmarks, average bench 89% 743GB free Firmware: CC49 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way above expectations (86^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 118 99 187876520 (03) Spinup time 97 97 0 (04) Start/Stop count 97 97 3651 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 84 60 247676442 (09) Power-on hours count 85 85 13967 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 97 97 4072 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BC) Unknown 100 100 0 (BD) vendor-specific 98 98 2 (BE) vendor-specific 80 56 8926658580 (BF) G-sense error rate 100 100 0 (C0) Power-off retract count 99 99 3335 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 88 88 24227 (C2) HDA temperature 20 44 -140737488355308 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (F0) Head flying hours 100 253 71077413789794 (F1) Unknown 100 253 21136317405 (F2) Unknown 100 253 27632056440	106% Outstanding	Read 191 Write 180 Mixed 170 136% 180 MB/s	4K Read 0.66 4K Write 2 4K Mixed 0.35 104% 1.01 MB/s
Poor: 55% ↑ This bench: 106% Great: 112%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Corsair Dominator DDR4 2400 C10 2x8GB 1,021 User benchmarks, average bench 79% 2 of 2 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 2133 MHz clocked @ 2400 MHz Performing below potential (33^rd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	74.5% Very good	MC Read 26.4 MC Write 28.4 MC Mixed 25 76% 26.6 GB/s	SC Read 14.5 SC Write 25.5 SC Mixed 16.6 54% 18.9 GB/s	Latency 54 74% 54 ns
Poor: 44% ↑ This bench: 74.5% Great: 107%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Z270M-ITX/ac Builds (Compare 333 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 71%

Battleship

Desktop 89%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 60%

Destroyer

Motherboard: Asrock Z270M-ITX/ac

CPU
Core i7-7700KIntel $250Bench 84%, 712,312 samples	153x
Core i5-7600KIntel $190Bench 76%, 195,006 samples	75x
Core i5-7400Intel $110Bench 64%, 234,266 samples	19x

GPU
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	53x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	47x
GTX 1080Nvidia $400Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	27x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	14x
960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GBSamsung $45Bench 199%, 240,629 samples	12x
860 Evo 1TBSamsung $130Bench 112%, 602,853 samples	11x

RAM
DDR4 3000 2OZ 2x8GBUnknownBench 79%, 14,178 samples	33x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GBCorsair $43Bench 82%, 606,405 samples	24x
Ripjaws V DDR4 2400 C15 2x8GBG.SKILL $40Bench 71%, 98,777 samples	13x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 100% - Outstanding

Total price: $410

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $132	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $186	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $34	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16