Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing CPU, RAM
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (54th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 46 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Graphics	3.34% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	78% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (38%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing as expected (54^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-3230M-$100 61,311 User benchmarks, average bench 49% U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.6 GHz Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete		1-Core 57.1 2-Core 133 42% 95.2 Pts	4-Core 196 8-Core 200 26% 198 Pts	64-Core 216 13% 216 Pts
Poor: 30% Great: 58%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD 4000 (Mobile 1.25 GHz) 409,110 User benchmarks, average bench 3% Legend(17AA 3977) 2GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.10.4252 Performing as expected (57^th percentile)	3.34% Terrible	Lighting 3.73 Reflection 4.81 Parallax 2.56 3% 3.7 fps	MRender 4.38 Gravity 2.1 Splatting 6.96 4% 4.48 fps
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 3.34% Great: 4%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100 951,591 User benchmarks, average bench 103% 96GB free (System drive) Firmware: EMT01B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (8^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 99 99 3 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 18 (B1) Unknown 100 100 0 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 50 44 50 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (EB) Unknown 99 99 3 (F1) Unknown 99 99 252669128	78% Very good	Read 500 Write 406 Mixed 404 97% 436 MB/s	4K Read 28.1 4K Write 49.2 4K Mixed 21.4 96% 32.9 MB/s	DQ Read 35.8 DQ Write 165 DQ Mixed 19.3 38% 73.3 MB/s
Poor: 72% ↑ This bench: 78% Great: 124%
ST1000LM 024 HN-M101MBB 1TB 44 User benchmarks, average bench 27% 896GB free, PID 022e Operating at USB 3.0 Speed Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	41% Average	Read 106 Write 88.3 Mixed 73.6 110% 89.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.49 4K Write 2.06 4K Mixed 0.27 81% 0.94 MB/s
Poor: 9% ↑ This bench: 41% Great: 40%

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 7%

Tree trunk

Desktop 50%

Yacht

Workstation 7%

Tree trunk

GPU
HD 4000 (Mobile 1.25 GHz)IntelBench 3%, 409,110 samples	79x
GeForce GT 635MNvidiaBench 3%, 3,113 samples	5x
HD Graphics (G2 Pentium/Celeron 1.1/1.15 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 45,735 samples	2x

RAM
RMT3160ED58E9W1600 2x4GBRamaxelBench 53%, 6,794 samples	15x
HMT351S6CFR8C-PB 2x4GBHynixBench 50%, 25,458 samples	8x
HMT351S6EFR8C-PB HMT325S6EFR8C-PB 6GBUnknownBench 44%, 132 samples	5x

Value: 55% - Above average

Total price: $128

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16