Asus PRIME X370-PRO

Performance Results


Gaming 73% Battleship	Desktop 79% Battleship	Workstation 76% Battleship


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (67th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 33 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 75.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	96.3% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	71.8% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (11%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Motherboard	Asus PRIME X370-PRO (all builds)
Memory	14.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.9 GHz
Display	1842 x 1036 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20170320
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Mar 25 '17 at 13:34
Run Duration	143 Seconds
Run User	SVK-User
Background CPU	11%

PC Performing above expectations (67^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 7 1700-$195 144,475 User benchmarks, average bench 69% AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (91^st percentile)	75.7% Very good	Memory 75.4 1-Core 112 2-Core 219 75% 136 Pts	4-Core 408 8-Core 783 71% 596 Pts	64-Core 1,349 84% 1,349 Pts
Poor: 59% ↑ This bench: 75.7% Great: 81%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 980-Ti-$560 214,030 User benchmarks, average bench 79% Gigabyte(1458 36B6) CLim: 1644 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 378.78 Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	96.3% Outstanding	Lighting 124 Reflection 125 Parallax 124 101% 124 fps	MRender 105 Gravity 112 Splatting 103 87% 107 fps
Poor: 70% ↑ This bench: 96.3% Great: 87%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
OCZ Trion 150 480GB-$300 13,412 User benchmarks, average bench 85% 234GB free (System drive) Firmware: SAFZ12.3 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (16^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 1437 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 741 (A7) Unknown 100 100 0 (A8) Unknown 100 100 0 (A9) Unknown 100 100 0 (AD) Unknown 199 199 0 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 183 (C2) HDA temperature 68 61 167504904224 (F1) Unknown 100 100 187937	71.8% Very good	Read 513 Write 352 Mixed 354 90% 406 MB/s	4K Read 27.6 4K Write 47 4K Mixed 9.89 79% 28.1 MB/s	DQ Read 203 DQ Write 122 DQ Mixed 47 66% 124 MB/s
Poor: 60% ↑ This bench: 71.8% Great: 101%
OCZ VERTEX3 90GB 979 User benchmarks, average bench 64% 15GB free Firmware: 2.25 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing as expected (47^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 4595713 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 1 (09) Power-on hours count 80 80 -87840671119604 (0C) Power cycle count 98 98 2502 (AB) Unknown 0 0 0 (AC) Unknown 0 0 0 (AE) Unknown 0 0 3985 (B1) Unknown 0 0 3 (B5) Unknown 0 0 0 (B6) Unknown 0 0 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (C2) HDA temperature 30 30 128850984990 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 120 120 4595713 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 1 (C9) Soft read error rate 120 120 4595713 (CC) Soft ECC correction 120 120 4595713 (E6) GMR head amplitude 100 100 100 (E7) Temperature 96 96 0 (E9) Unknown 0 0 18506 (EA) Unknown 0 0 19170 (F1) Unknown 0 0 19170 (F2) Unknown 0 0 20412	63.1% Good	Read 508 Write 102 Mixed 207 59% 272 MB/s	4K Read 26.3 4K Write 73.7 4K Mixed 16.9 100% 39 MB/s	DQ Read 193 DQ Write 131 DQ Mixed 43.9 65% 122 MB/s
Poor: 50% ↑ This bench: 63.1% Great: 77%
WD Green 2TB (2011)-$70 212,471 User benchmarks, average bench 51% 305GB free Firmware: 51.0AB51 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing as expected (49^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 300 (03) Spinup time 186 170 5658 (04) Start/Stop count 94 94 6809 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 200 200 0 (09) Power-on hours count 74 74 19533 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 95 95 5753 (C0) Power-off retract count 197 197 2894 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 153 153 143825 (C2) HDA temperature 120 111 30 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 200 200 1	51.5% Above average	Read 98.2 Write 81.4 Mixed 81.9 66% 87.1 MB/s	4K Read 0.46 4K Write 1.54 4K Mixed 0.21 71% 0.74 MB/s
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 51.5% Great: 67%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston KHX2400C 1x16GB 102 User benchmarks, average bench 42% 1 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 2933 MHz clocked @ 1467 MHz Performing below potential (99^th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	51.2% Above average	MC Read 20.1 MC Write 16.1 MC Mixed 15.1 49% 17.1 GB/s	SC Read 19.3 SC Write 18.6 SC Mixed 20.4 56% 19.4 GB/s	Latency 89.5 45% 89.5 ns
Poor: 36% ↑ This bench: 51.2% Great: 47%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical PRIME X370-PRO Builds (Compare 2,522 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 74%

Battleship

Desktop 75%

Battleship

Workstation 72%

Battleship

Motherboard: Asus PRIME X370-PRO - $109

CPU
Ryzen 7 1700AMD $195Bench 69%, 144,475 samples	416x
Ryzen 7 1700XAMD $225Bench 71%, 66,470 samples	326x
Ryzen 5 1600AMD $110Bench 70%, 392,253 samples	204x

GPU
GTX 1080Nvidia $400Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	214x
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	194x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	188x

SSD
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	94x
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $109Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	89x
960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GBSamsung $45Bench 199%, 240,629 samples	75x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GBCorsair $43Bench 82%, 606,405 samples	160x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $40Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	122x
Ripjaws V DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBG.SKILL $37Bench 84%, 287,720 samples	57x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 64% - Good

Total price: $847

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

Asus PRIME X370-PRO

Performance Results

PC Performing above expectations (67th percentile)

System Memory Latency Ladder

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

Motherboard: Asus PRIME X370-PRO - $109

Feedback

PC Performing above expectations (67^th percentile)