Gigabyte GA-EP43T-USB3

Performance Results


Gaming 19% Surfboard	Desktop 60% Destroyer	Workstation 14% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (54th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 46 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 52.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	30.9% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	69.6% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

High background CPU (25%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Motherboard	Gigabyte GA-EP43T-USB3 (all builds)
Memory	6.2 GB free of 8 GB @ 0.4 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20111011
Uptime	0.3 Days
Run Date	Apr 01 '17 at 17:46
Run Duration	146 Seconds
Run User	SWE-User
Background CPU	25%

Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (54^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core2 Quad Q8400-$150 18,432 User benchmarks, average bench 45% Socket 775, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.65 GHz Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	52.6% Above average	Memory 78.2 1-Core 39.9 2-Core 80.7 44% 66.3 Pts	4-Core 159 8-Core 160 21% 160 Pts	64-Core 161 10% 161 Pts
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 52.6% Great: 52%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59 946,701 User benchmarks, average bench 29% Asus(1043 85C1) CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 375.63 Performing way above expectations (85^th percentile)	30.9% Below average	Lighting 38.3 Reflection 30.3 Parallax 36.7 31% 35.1 fps	MRender 39.5 Gravity 36.8 Splatting 35.2 30% 37.2 fps
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 30.9% Great: 33%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100 951,591 User benchmarks, average bench 103% 155GB free (System drive) Firmware: EMT02B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below potential (5^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 99 99 3641 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 481 (B1) Unknown 99 99 5 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 60 52 40 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (EB) Unknown 99 99 17 (F1) Unknown 99 99 3686849493	69.6% Good	Read 259 Write 208 Mixed 142 45% 203 MB/s	4K Read 34.2 4K Write 55.4 4K Mixed 35.8 127% 41.8 MB/s	DQ Read 184 DQ Write 143 DQ Mixed 71.3 78% 133 MB/s
Poor: 72% ↑ This bench: 69.6% Great: 124%
Samsung Spinpoint F2 1TB-$60 32,476 User benchmarks, average bench 45% 664GB free Firmware: 1AG01118 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing above expectations (63^rd percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (03) Spinup time 71 71 9470 (04) Start/Stop count 98 98 2390 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 100 0 (08) Seek timer performance 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 96 96 21349 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 98 98 2386 (0D) Soft read error rate 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 3 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BC) Unknown 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 74 61 437256218 (C2) HDA temperature 73 58 454033435 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 100 100 289868 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 91 3897 (C8) Write error rate 100 100 0 (C9) Soft read error rate 253 253 0	47.8% Average	Read 81.9 Write 84.5 Mixed 34.1 49% 66.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.46 4K Write 1.34 4K Mixed 0.37 85% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 28% ↑ This bench: 47.8% Great: 58%
WD Red 4TB (2013)-$110 55,507 User benchmarks, average bench 75% 10GB free Firmware: 82.00A82 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (8^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 0 (03) Spinup time 171 170 8416 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 226 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 200 200 0 (09) Power-on hours count 98 98 2056 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 225 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 6 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 200 200 2666 (C2) HDA temperature 119 105 33 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 253 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 100 253 0	48.1% Average	Read 87.7 Write 79.7 Mixed 43.6 52% 70.3 MB/s	4K Read 0.41 4K Write 2.26 4K Mixed 0.29 91% 0.99 MB/s
Poor: 46% ↑ This bench: 48.1% Great: 100%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 4x2GB 183,252 User benchmarks, average bench 25% 4 of 4 slots used 8GB DIMM Performing above expectations (64^th percentile)	23.8% Poor	MC Read 8.5 MC Write 6.9 MC Mixed 7.1 21% 7.5 GB/s	SC Read 6.9 SC Write 6.7 SC Mixed 7.2 20% 6.93 GB/s	Latency 83.9 48% 83.9 ns
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 23.8% Great: 45%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical GA-EP43T-USB3 Builds (Compare 71 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 17%

Surfboard

Desktop 58%

Gunboat

Workstation 13%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-EP43T-USB3

CPU
Core2 Quad Q9550Intel $161Bench 49%, 34,093 samples	28x
Core2 Quad Q9650Intel $170Bench 51%, 16,719 samples	7x
Core2 Duo E7500Intel $109Bench 39%, 39,897 samples	6x

GPU
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	5x
RX 550AMD $79Bench 14%, 79,894 samples	5x
GeForce 210NvidiaBench 1%, 98,254 samples	4x

SSD
SSD Plus 240GBSanDisk $28Bench 61%, 133,640 samples	5x
860 Evo 250GBSamsung $52Bench 104%, 296,814 samples	4x
SSD 120GBBench 68%, 22,748 samples	3x

RAM
4x2GBUnknownBench 25%, 183,252 samples	21x
2x2GBUnknownBench 20%, 446,702 samples	15x
2x4GBUnknownBench 39%, 424,126 samples	7x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 67% - Good

Total price: $248

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16