Lenovo 4383

Performance Results


Gaming 3% Tree trunk	Desktop 27% Raft	Workstation 3% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (38th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 62 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 27%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics	0.55% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	46.4% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 8 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Sub-optimal background CPU (11%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

7 years ago, 7 years ago, 5 years ago.

System	Lenovo 4383 (all builds)
Motherboard	LENOVO Inagua
Memory	4.3 GB free of 6 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display	1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20110527
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Apr 02 '17 at 22:06
Run Duration	390 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	11%

PC Performing below expectations (38^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD E-350 6,654 User benchmarks, average bench 25% Socket FT1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 1.6 GHz Performing above expectations (61^st percentile)	27% Poor	Memory 47.9 1-Core 19.8 2-Core 38.5 25% 35.4 Pts	4-Core 38.4 8-Core 38.7 5% 38.6 Pts	64-Core 38.8 2% 38.8 Pts
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 27% Great: 36%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 6310 13,166 User benchmarks, average bench 1% Legend(17AA 397C) 384MB Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 8.881.0.0 Performing as expected (59^th percentile)	0.55% Terrible	Lighting 0.6 Reflection 0.92 Parallax 0.75 0% 0.76 fps	MRender 0.9 Gravity 0.53 Splatting 1 1% 0.81 fps
Poor: 0% ↑ This bench: 0.55% Great: 1%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingdian S500 120GB 6 User benchmarks, average bench 81% 74GB free (System drive) Firmware: O082 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Relative performance (0^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 4 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 8 (A0) Unknown 100 100 0 (A1) Unknown 100 100 106 (A3) Unknown 100 100 13 (A4) Unknown 100 100 573 (A5) Unknown 100 100 5 (A6) Unknown 100 100 0 (A7) Unknown 100 100 0 (A8) Unknown 100 100 3000 (A9) Unknown 100 100 100 (AF) Unknown 100 100 0 (B0) Unknown 100 100 0 (B1) Unknown 100 100 0 (B2) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 1 (C2) HDA temperature 100 100 40 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 100 100 202 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (E8) Unknown 100 100 100 (F1) Unknown 100 100 1869 (F2) Unknown 100 100 1958 (F5) Unknown 100 100 2292	46.4% Average	Read 252 Write 236 Mixed 254 55% 247 MB/s	4K Read 15.1 4K Write 23.3 4K Mixed 18.6 59% 19 MB/s	DQ Read 81.3 DQ Write 69.1 DQ Mixed 36.7 38% 62.4 MB/s
Poor: 68% ↑ This bench: 46.4% Great: 103%
Flash Drive AU_USB20 2GB 102 User benchmarks, average bench 5% 2GB free, PID 6387 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed Performing way below expectations (18^th percentile)	3.24% Terrible	Read 14.3 Write 3.34 Mixed 1.87 6% 6.51 MB/s	4K Read 1.48 4K Write 0.03 4K Mixed 0.03 7% 0.51 MB/s
Poor: 4% ↑ This bench: 3.24% Great: 6%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M471B5773CHS-CH9 F3-10666CL9-4GBSQ 6GB 7 User benchmarks, average bench 30% 1066, 1066 MHz 2048, 4096 MB Performing below potential (14^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	11.4% Very poor	MC Read 3.9 MC Write 2.7 MC Mixed 4.4 10% 3.67 GB/s	SC Read 2.5 SC Write 2.5 SC Mixed 3.6 8% 2.87 GB/s	Latency 169 24% 169 ns
Poor: 9% ↑ This bench: 11.4% Great: 45%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical 4383 Builds (Compare 12 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 1%

Tree trunk

Desktop 14%

Tree trunk

Workstation 1%

Tree trunk

System: Lenovo 4383

CPU
E-450 APUAMDBench 26%, 9,307 samples	5x
E-300 APUAMD $120Bench 23%, 7,672 samples	3x
C-50AMDBench 21%, 1,781 samples	2x

GPU
Radeon HD 6320AMDBench 1%, 8,182 samples	5x
Radeon HD 6310AMDBench 1%, 13,166 samples	3x
Radeon HD 6250AMDBench 1%, 1,583 samples	2x

SSD
HG5d Q Series 256GBToshiba $225Bench 82%, 3,223 samples	1x
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	1x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	1x

RAM
HMT325S6BFR8C-H9 1x2GBHynixBench 19%, 1,846 samples	2x
M471B5273CH0-CH9 1x4GBSamsungBench 24%, 13,596 samples	1x
HMT451S6BFR8A-PB 1x4GBHynixBench 25%, 64,960 samples	1x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 6% - Terrible

Total price: $225

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

Lenovo 4383

Performance Results

Run History

PC Performing below expectations (38th percentile)

System Memory Latency Ladder

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

System: Lenovo 4383

Feedback

PC Performing below expectations (38^th percentile)