Ÿÿÿÿÿÿ ÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿ

Performance Results


Gaming 37% Jet ski	Desktop 79% Battleship	Workstation 29% Raft


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (49th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 51 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 71.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	50.3% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	50.5% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen.

System	Ÿÿÿÿÿÿ ÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿ (all builds)
Motherboard
Memory	5.4 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores
OS	Windows 8.1
BIOS Date	20140626
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Apr 03 '17 at 21:52
Run Duration	403 Seconds
Run User	VEN-User
Background CPU	5%

Watch Gameplay: 480 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (49^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-4690-$52 73,695 User benchmarks, average bench 67% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (79^th percentile)	71.7% Very good	Memory 83.8 1-Core 112 2-Core 211 77% 136 Pts	4-Core 331 8-Core 421 48% 376 Pts	64-Core 420 26% 420 Pts
Poor: 50% ↑ This bench: 71.7% Great: 77%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD RX 480-$75 261,163 User benchmarks, average bench 46% Asus(1043 04FB) CLim: 1310 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 16.11.4 Performing above expectations (83^rd percentile)	50.3% Above average	Lighting 62.6 Reflection 68.8 Parallax 79.1 51% 70.2 fps	MRender 67.6 Gravity 60.2 Splatting 54.1 49% 60.6 fps
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 50.3% Great: 53%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston SSDNow UV400 120GB-$35 80,916 User benchmarks, average bench 67% 43GB free (System drive) Firmware: D6SD Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (11^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 3267 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 291 (64) Unknown 100 100 3169328 (65) Unknown 100 100 650736 (AA) Unknown 100 100 0 (AB) Unknown 100 100 0 (AC) Unknown 100 100 0 (AE) Unknown 100 100 126 (AF) Unknown 100 100 0 (B0) Unknown 100 100 0 (B1) Unknown 94 94 1904 (B2) Unknown 100 100 0 (B4) Unknown 100 100 691 (B7) Unknown 97 97 30 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (C2) HDA temperature 32 100 176094838816 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 100 100 0 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (C9) Soft read error rate 100 100 0 (CC) Soft ECC correction 100 100 0 (E7) Temperature 96 96 4 (E9) Unknown 100 100 5595 (EA) Unknown 100 100 3494 (F1) Unknown 100 100 4667 (F2) Unknown 100 100 5356 (FA) Read error retry rate 100 100 0	50.5% Above average	Read 449 Write 197 Mixed 192 61% 279 MB/s	4K Read 19.3 4K Write 40.5 4K Mixed 7.61 60% 22.5 MB/s	DQ Read 23.9 DQ Write 124 DQ Mixed 4.97 24% 51.1 MB/s
Poor: 44% ↑ This bench: 50.5% Great: 82%
WD Green 1TB (2011)-$64 143,477 User benchmarks, average bench 64% 164GB free Firmware: 1A01 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below expectations (30^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 0 (03) Spinup time 139 136 4025 (04) Start/Stop count 98 98 2549 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 200 200 0 (09) Power-on hours count 89 89 8690 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 98 98 2106 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 362 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 170 170 90405 (C2) HDA temperature 115 99 28 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 2 (C8) Write error rate 200 200 0	55.4% Above average	Read 100 Write 92.5 Mixed 92.3 72% 95 MB/s	4K Read 0.92 4K Write 2.38 4K Mixed 0.2 105% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 38% ↑ This bench: 55.4% Great: 85%
Kingston DataTraveler G3 4GB 266 User benchmarks, average bench 5% 3GB free, PID 6544 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed Performing above expectations (85^th percentile)	6% Terrible	Read 24.1 Write 3.06 Mixed 6.32 10% 11.2 MB/s	4K Read 7.65 4K Write 0.008 4K Mixed 0.01 29% 2.56 MB/s
Poor: 4% ↑ This bench: 6% Great: 7%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Corsair Vengeance Pro DDR3 1600 C9 2x4GB 6,123 User benchmarks, average bench 48% 2 of 4 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR3 1600 MHz clocked @ 1333 MHz Performing below potential (4^th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	27.3% Poor	MC Read 8.5 MC Write 9.1 MC Mixed 7.8 24% 8.47 GB/s	SC Read 8.7 SC Write 9.1 SC Mixed 8.4 25% 8.73 GB/s	Latency 73.8 54% 73.8 ns
Poor: 28% ↑ This bench: 27.3% Great: 61%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical ÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿ Builds (Compare 1 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 0%

Incomplete

Desktop 0%

Incomplete

Workstation 0%

Incomplete

System: Ÿÿÿÿÿÿ ÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿ

CPU
Core i3-4130Intel $42Bench 52%, 49,509 samples	1x

GPU
Radeon HD 6670AMDBench 6%, 32,193 samples	1x

RAM
RMR1810EC58E8F1333 0913 M378B1G73EB0-CK0 10GBUnknownBench 33%, 1 sample	1x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 88% - Excellent

Total price: $42

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

Ÿÿÿÿÿÿ ÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿ

Performance Results

PC Performing as expected (49th percentile)

System Memory Latency Ladder

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

System: Ÿÿÿÿÿÿ ÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿ

Feedback

PC Performing as expected (49^th percentile)