Asus Z170 PRO GAMING

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 23%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 21%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (62nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 38 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 82.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics19.1% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive99.7% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (15%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
7 years ago, 7 years ago.
MotherboardAsus Z170 PRO GAMING  (all builds)
Memory23.3 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20151023
Uptime4.1 Days
Run DateApr 04 '17 at 00:43
Run Duration398 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 15%

 PC Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-6700K-$180
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
82.6% Excellent
Memory 89.4
1-Core 125
2-Core 240
85% 151 Pts
4-Core 408
8-Core 619
64% 514 Pts
64-Core 663
41% 663 Pts
Poor: 70%
This bench: 82.6%
Great: 90%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 750-Ti-$92
CLim: 1450 MHz, MLim: 1350 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 376.53
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
19.1% Very poor
Lighting 23.7
Reflection 18.8
Parallax 21.7
19% 21.4 fps
MRender 26.4
Gravity 24.9
Splatting 18.5
18% 23.3 fps
Poor: 16%
This bench: 19.1%
Great: 19%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intel 750 Series NVMe PCIe 400GB-$550
322GB free
Firmware: 8EV10171 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
213% Outstanding
Read 1,973
Write 949
Mixed 1,314
311% 1,412 MB/s
4K Read 40.8
4K Write 203
4K Mixed 50
234% 98.1 MB/s
DQ Read 42
DQ Write 236
DQ Mixed 30.2
55% 103 MB/s
Poor: 123%
This bench: 213%
Great: 230%
SanDisk Extreme Pro 240GB-$79
51GB free (System drive)
Firmware: X21200RL Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
99.7% Outstanding
Read 513
Write 445
Mixed 439
104% 466 MB/s
4K Read 31
4K Write 97.6
4K Mixed 23.7
129% 50.8 MB/s
DQ Read 333
DQ Write 298
DQ Mixed 64.2
117% 232 MB/s
Poor: 65%
This bench: 99.7%
Great: 114%
Seagate ST6000VN0011-1UL17Z 6TB
4TB free
Firmware: AN02 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
98.1% Outstanding
Read 160
Write 181
Mixed 153
124% 165 MB/s
4K Read 1.38
4K Write 3.18
4K Mixed 0.39
160% 1.65 MB/s
Poor: 59%
This bench: 98.1%
Great: 107%
Seagate ST31000340AS 1TB-$136
743GB free
Firmware: SD1A Max speed: SATA 1.0 150 MB/s
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
50.4% Above average
Read 87.2
Write 88.3
Mixed 76
63% 83.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.81
4K Write 1.84
4K Mixed 0.54
128% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 50.4%
Great: 59%
WL4000GSA6472E 4TB
561GB free
Firmware: 01.00101 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
58.6% Above average
Read 89.9
Write 114
Mixed 104
78% 103 MB/s
4K Read 0.53
4K Write 2.78
4K Mixed 0.39
117% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 58.6%
Great: 96%
Generic Flash Disk 1GB
1GB free, PID 6387
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
4.17% Terrible
Read 15.8
Write 3.82
Mixed 6.07
9% 8.55 MB/s
4K Read 4.33
4K Write 0.01
4K Mixed 0.01
17% 1.45 MB/s
Poor: 2%
This bench: 4.17%
Great: 7%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 2666 C16 2x16GB-$74
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
73.7% Very good
MC Read 26.5
MC Write 27.7
MC Mixed 23.3
74% 25.8 GB/s
SC Read 17.3
SC Write 29.1
SC Mixed 23.2
66% 23.2 GB/s
Latency 68
59% 68 ns
Poor: 50%
This bench: 73.7%
Great: 94%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Z170 PRO GAMING Builds (Compare 13,890 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 69%
Battle cruiser
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 58%
Gunboat

Motherboard: Asus Z170 PRO GAMING - $295

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 95% - Outstanding Total price: $750
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $132Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $186Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $34Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback