Asus P8H67-M

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 23%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 18%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (61st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 39 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 77.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics28.1% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
MotherboardAsus P8H67-M  (all builds)
Memory14 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20110211
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateApr 07 '17 at 15:55
Run Duration387 Seconds
Run User ESP-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing above expectations (61st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-2500
LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
77.2% Very good
Memory 91.7
1-Core 98.8
2-Core 193
75% 128 Pts
4-Core 363
8-Core 370
49% 366 Pts
64-Core 370
23% 370 Pts
Poor: 47%
This bench: 77.2%
Great: 72%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 950-$100
Gigabyte(1458 36C3) 2GB
CLim: 1430 MHz, MLim: 1652 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 355.82
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
28.1% Poor
Lighting 35.3
Reflection 33.8
Parallax 29.7
29% 33 fps
MRender 35
Gravity 31.3
Splatting 31.9
27% 32.8 fps
Poor: 22%
This bench: 28.1%
Great: 28%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Blue 1TB (2010)-$39
716GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 15.01H15 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
70.2% Very good
Read 124
Write 121
Mixed 16.1
63% 86.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.63
4K Write 2.12
4K Mixed 0.27
96% 1.01 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 70.2%
Great: 74%
TOSHIBA External USB 3.0 1TB
532GB free, PID a200
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
13.2% Very poor
Read 23.1
Write 22.1
Mixed 22.6
29% 22.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.47
4K Write 1.61
4K Mixed 0.2
64% 0.76 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 13.2%
Great: 44%
ADATA USB Flash Drive 8GB
7GB free, PID c08a
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Performing as expected (44th percentile)
3.82% Terrible
Read 15.7
Write 3.57
Mixed 5.76
8% 8.35 MB/s
4K Read 3.15
4K Write 0.007
4K Mixed 0.005
12% 1.05 MB/s
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.82%
Great: 7%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
HyperX Fury DDR3 1600 C10 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 1333 MHz
Performing below potential (35th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
53.8% Above average
MC Read 18.6
MC Write 19.4
MC Mixed 17.1
52% 18.4 GB/s
SC Read 14.4
SC Write 17.7
SC Mixed 16.6
46% 16.2 GB/s
Latency 64.6
62% 64.6 ns
Poor: 31%
This bench: 53.8%
Great: 63%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical P8H67-M Builds (Compare 397 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus P8H67-M

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 67% - Good Total price: $232
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback