| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (38th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 62 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
| Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 62.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average. |
| Graphics | 23% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | 83% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times. |
| Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Very high background CPU (35%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
| Motherboard | Gigabyte GA-B85M-D3H (all builds) |
| Memory | 10.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz |
| Display | Цвета: 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit, Цвета: 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit |
| OS | Windows 10 |
| BIOS Date | 20150812 |
| Uptime | 0.6 Days |
| Run Date | Apr 09 '17 at 13:17 |
| Run Duration | 129 Seconds |
| Run User | EST-User |
| Background CPU | 35% |
PC Performing below expectations (38th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
62.9%
Good
|
62% 105 Pts
|
37% 278 Pts
|
18% 298 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Nvidia GTX 760-$209
Gigabyte(1458 360B) 2GB
CLim: 1306 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 378.92
Performing below potential (6th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
23%
Poor
|
22% 27.6 fps
|
25% 31.1 fps
| |
| Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
103GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT02B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
|
83%
Excellent
|
91% 408 MB/s
|
124% 43.7 MB/s
|
38% 66.4 MB/s
|
|
|
103%
Outstanding
|
131% 175 MB/s
|
85% 0.84 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
HyperX Fury DDR3 1600 C10 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing below potential (38th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
55%
Above average
|
57% 19.8 GB/s
|
41% 14.3 GB/s
|
48% 84.1 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical GA-B85M-D3H Builds (Compare 3,786 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-B85M-D3H - $76
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Core i5-4460Intel $194Bench 62%, 245,403 samples | 502x |
| Core i7-4790Intel $135Bench 71%, 255,027 samples | 495x |
| Core i7-4770Intel $75Bench 70%, 176,321 samples | 474x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| HD 4600 (Desktop 1.25 GHz)Intel $15Bench 3%, 230,189 samples | 473x |
| GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 226x |
| GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples | 223x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 62% - Good | Total price: $313 |