Asus M5A99X EVO R2.0

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 35%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 28%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (47th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 53 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 62.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics53% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive90.7% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus M5A99X EVO R2.0  (all builds)
Memory11 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140403
Uptime0.8 Days
Run DateApr 15 '17 at 12:01
Run Duration179 Seconds
Run User AUS-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing as expected (47th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD FX-6300-$57
Socket 942, 1 CPU, 3 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 4.1 GHz, turbo 4.1 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
62.1% Good
Memory 78.8
1-Core 71.5
2-Core 138
58% 96.2 Pts
4-Core 251
8-Core 330
37% 291 Pts
64-Core 326
20% 326 Pts
Poor: 44%
This bench: 62.1%
Great: 62%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 970-$200
Gainward(10B0 13C2) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1493 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 381.65
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
53% Above average
Lighting 66.2
Reflection 66.5
Parallax 61.9
54% 64.9 fps
MRender 73.4
Gravity 63.1
Splatting 54.7
51% 63.7 fps
Poor: 43%
This bench: 53%
Great: 54%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$109
353GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT02B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
90.7% Outstanding
Read 491
Write 380
Mixed 403
94% 425 MB/s
4K Read 36.2
4K Write 55.8
4K Mixed 37.4
132% 43.2 MB/s
DQ Read 187
DQ Write 126
DQ Mixed 72.7
77% 129 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 90.7%
Great: 134%
Kingston SSDNow V300 120GB-$37
109GB free
Firmware: 521ABBF0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
34.6% Below average
Read 144
Write 77.8
Mixed 91
23% 104 MB/s
4K Read 19.5
4K Write 51.2
4K Mixed 9.64
69% 26.8 MB/s
DQ Read 103
DQ Write 88
DQ Mixed 26.8
39% 72.5 MB/s
Poor: 30%
This bench: 34.6%
Great: 73%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$28
267GB free
Firmware: CC49 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
97.7% Outstanding
Read 179
Write 163
Mixed 155
124% 165 MB/s
4K Read 0.51
4K Write 0.37
4K Mixed 0.11
40% 0.33 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 97.7%
Great: 112%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston HyperX DDR3 1866 C10 4x4GB
4 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 1066 MHz clocked @ 533 MHz
Performing below potential (7th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
39.5% Below average
MC Read 15.2
MC Write 13.7
MC Mixed 13
40% 14 GB/s
SC Read 8.9
SC Write 8.3
SC Mixed 10.7
27% 9.3 GB/s
Latency 82.7
48% 82.7 ns
Poor: 39%
This bench: 39.5%
Great: 73%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical M5A99X EVO R2.0 Builds (Compare 753 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 34%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 28%
Raft

Motherboard: Asus M5A99X EVO R2.0 - $300

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 53% - Above average Total price: $729
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $132Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $186Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $34Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback