Asus P7H55-M/USB3

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 17% Surfboard	Desktop 74% Battleship	Workstation 13% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (74th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 26 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 73.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	22.8% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (16%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus P7H55-M/USB3 (all builds)
Memory	9.9 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20110425
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Apr 17 '17 at 13:39
Run Duration	98 Seconds
Run User	ZAF-User
Background CPU	16%

PC Performing above expectations (74^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7 870-$100 37,228 User benchmarks, average bench 66% LGA1156, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.95 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (97^th percentile)	73.6% Very good	Memory 92.6 1-Core 83.9 2-Core 163 68% 113 Pts	4-Core 320 8-Core 305 42% 312 Pts	64-Core 320 20% 320 Pts
Poor: 53% ↑ This bench: 73.6% Great: 74%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD RX 460-$90 64,240 User benchmarks, average bench 20% Gigabyte(1458 22D6) CLim: 1212 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 16.12.1 Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	22.8% Poor	Lighting 26.7 Reflection 31.2 Parallax 31.5 22% 29.8 fps	MRender 29.8 Gravity 24.8 Splatting 34.4 25% 29.7 fps
Poor: 17% ↑ This bench: 22.8% Great: 22%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Hitachi HUA721010KLA330 1TB-$28 10,651 User benchmarks, average bench 38% 47GB free (System drive) Firmware: GKAOAB0A Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing way below expectations (15^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (02) Throughput performance 130 130 152 (03) Spinup time 103 103 55879008933 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 302 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 100 0 (08) Seek timer performance 132 132 33 (09) Power-on hours count 95 95 35274 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 290 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 303 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 100 100 303 (C2) HDA temperature 157 157 206159413286 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0	28.4% Poor	Read 46.2 Write 52.3 Mixed 58 40% 52.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.67 4K Write 1.21 4K Mixed 0.3 83% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 28.4% Great: 46%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 12GB 85,415 User benchmarks, average bench 35% 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz 4096, 2048, 4096, 2048 MB Performing way above expectations (87^th percentile)	43.9% Average	MC Read 16.6 MC Write 13.8 MC Mixed 14.5 43% 15 GB/s	SC Read 11.2 SC Write 10 SC Mixed 12.7 32% 11.3 GB/s	Latency 62.9 64% 62.9 ns
Poor: 20% ↑ This bench: 43.9% Great: 50%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical P7H55-M/USB3 Builds (Compare 178 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 34%

Sail boat

Desktop 71%

Battleship

Workstation 26%

Raft

Motherboard: Asus P7H55-M/USB3

CPU
Core i5 760Intel $100Bench 64%, 34,495 samples	44x
Core i7 870Intel $100Bench 66%, 37,228 samples	27x
Core i5 650Intel $70Bench 46%, 42,063 samples	17x

GPU
GTX 1060-3GBNvidia $119Bench 52%, 627,793 samples	11x
HD Graphics (Clarkdale 0.733/0.9 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 20,588 samples	10x
GTX 550-TiNvidia $250Bench 9%, 54,392 samples	10x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	5x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	5x
S3 500G 500GBSandiskBench 92%, 12,292 samples	5x

RAM
8GBUnknownBench 34%, 82,857 samples	76x
16GBUnknownBench 41%, 70,565 samples	42x
12GBUnknownBench 35%, 85,415 samples	21x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 86% - Excellent

Total price: $247

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16