Asus H87M-E

Performance Results


Gaming 15% Tree trunk	Desktop 80% Battleship	Workstation 13% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (72nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 28 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 80.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	10.6% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	103% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Motherboard	Asus H87M-E (all builds)
Memory	12.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	Цвета: 1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20130815
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	Apr 19 '17 at 10:57
Run Duration	176 Seconds
Run User	RUS-User
Background CPU	1%

PC Performing above expectations (72^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-4770-$75 176,321 User benchmarks, average bench 70% SOCKET 1150, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.75 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	80.6% Excellent	Memory 92.6 1-Core 115 2-Core 223 82% 144 Pts	4-Core 370 8-Core 584 59% 477 Pts	64-Core 587 36% 587 Pts
Poor: 58% ↑ This bench: 80.6% Great: 78%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 6770 16,639 User benchmarks, average bench 10% Asus(1043 03FE) 1GB Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.200.1062.1004 Performing above expectations (82^nd percentile)	10.6% Very poor	Lighting 14 Reflection 10.8 Parallax 11.9 11% 12.2 fps	MRender 10 Gravity 10.3 Splatting 12.2 9% 10.9 fps
Poor: 9% ↑ This bench: 10.6% Great: 11%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
OCZ Vector 128GB-$71 1,277 User benchmarks, average bench 85% 74GB free (System drive) Firmware: 2.0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way above expectations (96^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 0 0 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 3790 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 2196 (AB) Unknown 80 80 18218320 (AE) Unknown 100 100 301 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 100 100 0 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (D0) Spin buzz 100 100 299 (D2) Unknown 100 100 0 (E9) Unknown 91 91 91 (F1) Unknown 100 100 12144 (F2) Unknown 100 100 8656 (F9) Unknown 100 100 979352810	103% Outstanding	Read 520 Write 380 Mixed 432 99% 444 MB/s	4K Read 22.5 4K Write 116 4K Mixed 36.7 142% 58.4 MB/s	DQ Read 350 DQ Write 335 DQ Mixed 108 146% 264 MB/s
Poor: 61% ↑ This bench: 103% Great: 103%
WD Black 1TB (2010)-$49 257,835 User benchmarks, average bench 57% 361GB free Firmware: 1D05 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing above expectations (60^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 0 (03) Spinup time 181 172 3908 (04) Start/Stop count 96 96 4515 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 253 0 (09) Power-on hours count 94 94 4691 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 98 98 2140 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 53 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 199 199 4461 (C2) HDA temperature 101 100 46 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 200 200 0	58.7% Above average	Read 116 Write 88.8 Mixed 89.1 74% 97.9 MB/s	4K Read 0.95 4K Write 0.39 4K Mixed 0.22 71% 0.52 MB/s
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 58.7% Great: 76%
Hitachi HTS 721010A9E630 1TB 1,664 User benchmarks, average bench 54% 238GB free Firmware: 8104 Performing way below expectations (15^th percentile)	23.6% Poor	Read 39.7 Write 42.3 Mixed 40.8 31% 40.9 MB/s	4K Read 0.58 4K Write 1.2 4K Mixed 0.18 66% 0.65 MB/s
Poor: 18% ↑ This bench: 23.6% Great: 76%
Seagate ST3250410AS 250GB-$95 20,246 User benchmarks, average bench 42% 233GB free Firmware: A Max speed: SATA 1.0 150 MB/s Performing above expectations (62^nd percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 116 97 104698218 (03) Spinup time 97 97 0 (04) Start/Stop count 93 93 7626 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 85 60 13872822864 (09) Power-on hours count 81 81 17319 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 94 94 6151 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BD) vendor-specific 98 98 2 (BE) vendor-specific 59 54 690487337 (C2) HDA temperature 41 46 60129542185 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 75 61 238224907 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 100 253 0 (CA) Data Address Mark errors 100 253 0	45.2% Average	Read 77.4 Write 80.1 Mixed 72.4 58% 76.6 MB/s	4K Read 0.67 4K Write 1.1 4K Mixed 0.41 93% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 45.2% Great: 54%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M378B5173QH0-CK0 4x4GB 3,356 User benchmarks, average bench 55% 4 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing way above expectations (91^st percentile)	59.4% Above average	MC Read 21.9 MC Write 21.4 MC Mixed 16.9 57% 20.1 GB/s	SC Read 16.6 SC Write 21.5 SC Mixed 21 56% 19.7 GB/s	Latency 62.9 64% 62.9 ns
Poor: 43% ↑ This bench: 59.4% Great: 69%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical H87M-E Builds (Compare 852 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 8%

Tree trunk

Desktop 65%

Destroyer

Workstation 7%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus H87M-E - $129

CPU
Core i7-4770Intel $75Bench 70%, 176,321 samples	195x
Core i5-4570Intel $99Bench 62%, 129,272 samples	128x
Core i5-4440Intel $128Bench 61%, 81,111 samples	76x

GPU
HD 4600 (Desktop 1.25 GHz)Intel $15Bench 3%, 230,189 samples	87x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	45x
RX 580AMD $130Bench 52%, 360,351 samples	40x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	43x
860 Evo 1TBSamsung $129Bench 112%, 602,853 samples	25x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	23x

RAM
Savage DDR3 1600 C9 2x4GBHyperXBench 51%, 78,181 samples	35x
HyperX DDR3 1600 C9 4x4GBKingstonBench 56%, 28,461 samples	25x
Fury DDR3 1600 C10 2x8GBHyperXBench 54%, 77,652 samples	16x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 75% - Very good

Total price: $247

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16