HP Z800 Workstation

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 26%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 70%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 25%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (30th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 70 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 68.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics35.6% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive46.1% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemHP Z800 Workstation  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 0AECh
Memory28.3 GB free of 32.002 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20111102
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateApr 19 '17 at 14:29
Run Duration171 Seconds
Run User EGY-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing below expectations (30th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: Intel Xeon X5670
CPU0 PROCESSOR, 2 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 2.95 GHz, turbo 3.15 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (46th percentile)
68.2% Good
Memory 77.9
1-Core 79
2-Core 158
62% 105 Pts
4-Core 316
8-Core 522
51% 419 Pts
64-Core 1,136
70% 1,136 Pts
Poor: 54%
This bench: 68.2%
Great: 75%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 770-$279
Asus(1043 8465) 2GB
CLim: 1215 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 381.65
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
35.6% Below average
Lighting 42.8
Reflection 38.8
Parallax 55
35% 45.5 fps
MRender 54.5
Gravity 49.4
Splatting 36.1
37% 46.7 fps
Poor: 32%
This bench: 35.6%
Great: 36%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
HyperX Savage 240GB-$120
171GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SAFM00.Y Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below potential (2nd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
46.1% Average
Read 167
Write 229
Mixed 193
44% 196 MB/s
4K Read 24.2
4K Write 54.8
4K Mixed 12.3
82% 30.4 MB/s
DQ Read 25.5
DQ Write 59.6
DQ Mixed 12.2
18% 32.4 MB/s
Poor: 59%
This bench: 46.1%
Great: 111%
WD WD1001FALS-41Y6A1 1TB
110GB free
Firmware: 05.03D06 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (20th percentile)
45.2% Average
Read 77.6
Write 79.6
Mixed 60.7
54% 72.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.58
4K Write 1.88
4K Mixed 0.24
86% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 45.2%
Great: 75%
WD My Passport 0820 1TB
15GB free, PID 0820
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
15.3% Very poor
Read 30.3
Write 27.6
Mixed 22.1
33% 26.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.54
4K Write 1.53
4K Mixed 0.24
62% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 15.3%
Great: 44%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown ID:01 98 KHX1600C10D3/8G ID:01 98 KHX1600C10D3/8G ID:01 98 KHX1600C10D3/8G ID:01 98 KHX1600C10D3/8G 66GB
1600, 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 34816 MB
Performing below potential (9th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
18.9% Very poor
MC Read 6.2
MC Write 5.6
MC Mixed 4.4
15% 5.4 GB/s
SC Read 7.7
SC Write 5.3
SC Mixed 7
19% 6.67 GB/s
Latency 84.5
47% 84.5 ns
Poor: 19%
This bench: 18.9%
Great: 35%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Z800 Workstation Builds (Compare 1,940 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk

System: HP Z800 Workstation

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback