Asus H97-PLUS

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 70%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (55th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 45 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 75.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics7.28% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive72.2% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (17%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
7 years ago, 7 years ago.
MotherboardAsus H97-PLUS  (all builds)
Memory2.9 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150304
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateApr 23 '17 at 02:23
Run Duration176 Seconds
Run User IDN-User
Background CPU 17%

 PC Performing as expected (55th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4790-$135
SOCKET 1150, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.8 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
75.1% Very good
Memory 86.7
1-Core 94.5
2-Core 168
69% 116 Pts
4-Core 344
8-Core 498
53% 421 Pts
64-Core 548
34% 548 Pts
Poor: 58%
This bench: 75.1%
Great: 80%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD HD 7730
MSI(1462 2795) 1GB
CLim: 800 MHz, MLim: 1125 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 16.6
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
7.28% Terrible
Lighting 8.17
Reflection 11.6
Parallax 10.8
7% 10.2 fps
MRender 10.2
Gravity 7.67
Splatting 12.4
8% 10.1 fps
Poor: 6%
This bench: 7.28%
Great: 7%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 750 EVO 250GB-$55
84GB free (System drive)
Firmware: MAT01B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
72.2% Very good
Read 474
Write 261
Mixed 274
74% 336 MB/s
4K Read 33.9
4K Write 55.4
4K Mixed 22.7
110% 37.4 MB/s
DQ Read 30.4
DQ Write 176
DQ Mixed 14.8
37% 73.8 MB/s
Poor: 63%
This bench: 72.2%
Great: 114%
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
20GB free
Firmware: EMT01B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
106% Outstanding
Read 501
Write 406
Mixed 419
98% 442 MB/s
4K Read 38.7
4K Write 85.5
4K Mixed 42.8
159% 55.7 MB/s
DQ Read 260
DQ Write 279
DQ Mixed 102
123% 213 MB/s
Poor: 72%
This bench: 106%
Great: 124%
WD Blue 2TB (2015)-$84
1.5TB free
Firmware: 00.02C.5 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
87.5% Excellent
Read 149
Write 156
Mixed 142
112% 149 MB/s
4K Read 1.04
4K Write 1.96
4K Mixed 0.23
105% 1.08 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 87.5%
Great: 84%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$37
289GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
49.7% Average
Read 122
Write 51
Mixed 74.4
62% 82.5 MB/s
4K Read 1.03
4K Write 1.01
4K Mixed 0.12
75% 0.72 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 49.7%
Great: 109%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance DDR3 1600 C9 2x4GB
2 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
50% Average
MC Read 18
MC Write 18.3
MC Mixed 15.6
49% 17.3 GB/s
SC Read 11.7
SC Write 15.9
SC Mixed 14.9
40% 14.2 GB/s
Latency 70.7
56% 70.7 ns
Poor: 28%
This bench: 50%
Great: 62%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical H97-PLUS Builds (Compare 1,914 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 39%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 32%
Sail boat

Motherboard: Asus H97-PLUS - $132

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 57% - Above average Total price: $567
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback