| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (39th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 61 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
| Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 58.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average. |
| Graphics | 46.7% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times. |
| Memory | 8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 8 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager. |
Very high background CPU (44%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
| Motherboard | Asus M4A79XTD EVO (all builds) |
| Memory | 4.6 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz |
| Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben |
| OS | Windows 7 |
| BIOS Date | 20091125 |
| Uptime | 0 Days |
| Run Date | Apr 23 '17 at 20:15 |
| Run Duration | 92 Seconds |
| Run User | DEU-User |
| Background CPU | 44% |
PC Performing below expectations (39th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
AMD Phenom II X4 965-$144
AM3, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 4 GHz
|
58.5%
Above average
|
54% 84 Pts
|
24% 185 Pts
|
14% 231 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
AMD R9 390-$325
CLim: 1040 MHz, MLim: 1500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 17.3.1
Performing below potential (21st percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
46.7%
Average
|
48% 69.6 fps
|
45% 52.2 fps
| |
| Drive | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
63%
Good
|
72% 96.5 MB/s
|
25% 0.17 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Unknown 2x4GB
2 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM
Performing below potential (31st percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
26.6%
Poor
|
24% 8.57 GB/s
|
18% 6.4 GB/s
|
57% 70.7 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical M4A79XTD EVO Builds (Compare 104 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: Asus M4A79XTD EVO
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Phenom II X4 955AMD $83Bench 51%, 41,403 samples | 26x |
| Phenom II X4 965AMD $144Bench 53%, 43,442 samples | 26x |
| Phenom II X6 1100TAMD $340Bench 59%, 12,769 samples | 12x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| HD 5770AMDBench 10%, 37,602 samples | 13x |
| R9 270XAMD $199Bench 27%, 77,943 samples | 4x |
| GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples | 4x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 59% - Above average | Total price: $111 |