Gigabyte GA-G31MF-S2

Performance Results


Gaming 1% Tree trunk	Desktop 11% Tree trunk	Workstation 1% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (48th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 52 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 18.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is terrible.
Graphics	4.72% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	39.7% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	2GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows however a minimum of 4GB is recommended for gaming or any other RAM intensive tasks such as photo/video editing. This system will also be a little more responsive with 4GB of RAM.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago.

System	Gigabyte EG31MF-S2
Motherboard	Gigabyte GA-G31MF-S2 (all builds)
Memory	0.3 GB free of 2 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display	1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit kleuren
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20080725
Uptime	0.3 Days
Run Date	Apr 24 '17 at 13:57
Run Duration	189 Seconds
Run User	NLD-User
Background CPU	100%

PC Performing as expected (48^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Pentium Dual E2200-$54 8,325 User benchmarks, average bench 33% Socket 775, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 2.35 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)	18.8% Very poor	Memory 31.4 1-Core 14.8 2-Core 23.9 16% 23.4 Pts	4-Core 37.7 8-Core 37.1 5% 37.4 Pts	64-Core 33.6 2% 33.6 Pts
Poor: 19% ↑ This bench: 18.8% Great: 42%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
ATI Radeon HD 3800 3,400 User benchmarks, average bench 5% PwrHis(1787 2245) 512MB Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 8.970.100.9001 Performing as expected (55^th percentile)	4.72% Terrible	Lighting 5.53 Reflection 6.12 Parallax 1.91 4% 4.52 fps	MRender 6.43 Gravity 2.8 Splatting 8.65 5% 5.96 fps
Poor: 4% ↑ This bench: 4.72% Great: 6%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung MZ7WD240HCFV-00003 240GB 107 User benchmarks, average bench 86% 98GB free (System drive) Firmware: DXM9203Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Relative performance (0^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 99 99 3433 (0C) Power cycle count 98 98 1359 (B1) Unknown 99 99 56 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B4) Unknown 100 100 4880 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 67 58 33 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (CA) Data Address Mark errors 100 100 0 (EB) Unknown 99 99 287 (F1) Unknown 99 99 16336357487	39.7% Below average	Read 236 Write 224 Mixed 231 51% 230 MB/s	4K Read 11.6 4K Write 23.8 4K Mixed 14.4 48% 16.6 MB/s	DQ Read 18.8 DQ Write 46.4 DQ Mixed 13.7 16% 26.3 MB/s
Poor: 56% ↑ This bench: 39.7% Great: 106%
Samsung Spinpoint F1 1TB-$100 65,786 User benchmarks, average bench 47% 838GB free Firmware: 1AA01113 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 54 49 (03) Spinup time 76 76 7930 (04) Start/Stop count 92 92 8300 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 100 0 (08) Seek timer performance 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 97 97 14945 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 98 98 2466 (0D) Soft read error rate 100 57 41 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 3630 (BC) Unknown 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 72 58 470810652 (C2) HDA temperature 66 55 588251170 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 100 100 698151 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 2 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (C8) Write error rate 100 99 7 (C9) Soft read error rate 253 253 0	64.3% Good	Read 109 Write 115 Mixed 93.9 80% 106 MB/s	4K Read 0.46 4K Write 2.14 4K Mixed 0.5 115% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 64.3% Great: 62%
Samsung HD321KJ 320GB-$42 12,070 User benchmarks, average bench 33% 198GB free Firmware: CP100-12 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing as expected (60^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 253 100 0 (03) Spinup time 100 100 5568 (04) Start/Stop count 88 88 12568 (05) Reallocated sector count 253 253 0 (07) Seek error rate 253 253 0 (08) Seek timer performance 253 253 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 14910 (0A) Spinup retry count 253 253 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 253 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 96 96 4957 (0D) Soft read error rate 100 100 86762 (BB) vendor-specific 1 1 2247 (BC) Unknown 100 100 16 (BE) vendor-specific 69 56 31 (C2) HDA temperature 151 103 29 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 100 100 86762 (C4) Reallocation count 253 253 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 253 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 253 253 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 100 100 0 (C9) Soft read error rate 253 100 0 (CA) Data Address Mark errors 253 253 0	35.2% Below average	Read 63.5 Write 59.1 Mixed 59.4 46% 60.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.44 4K Write 1.23 4K Mixed 0.29 73% 0.65 MB/s
Poor: 21% ↑ This bench: 35.2% Great: 43%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 2x1GB 68,489 User benchmarks, average bench 14% 2 of 4 slots used 2GB DIMM Performing below expectations (20^th percentile)	9.2% Terrible	MC Read 4.3 MC Write 2.7 MC Mixed 3 10% 3.33 GB/s	SC Read 1.5 SC Write 1.2 SC Mixed 0.3 3% 1 GB/s	Latency 247 16% 247 ns
Poor: 6% ↑ This bench: 9.2% Great: 20%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical GA-G31MF-S2 Builds (Compare 14 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 2%

Tree trunk

Desktop 39%

Jet ski

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-G31MF-S2

CPU
Core2 Quad Q6600Intel $100Bench 42%, 59,658 samples	3x
Core2 Duo E6850Intel $57Bench 40%, 4,150 samples	2x
Core2 Quad Q8300Intel $115Bench 44%, 20,482 samples	2x

GPU
GeForce 9500 GTNvidiaBench 2%, 27,834 samples	2x
HD 4870ATIBench 9%, 22,563 samples	2x
GTX 760Nvidia $209Bench 26%, 161,132 samples	1x

SSD
Burst 120GBPatriotBench 66%, 15,567 samples	2x
SSDNow V300 120GBKingston $38Bench 54%, 339,020 samples	2x
840 Evo 250GBSamsung $95Bench 96%, 217,115 samples	2x

RAM
2x2GBUnknownBench 20%, 446,702 samples	13x
4x1GBUnknownBench 18%, 54,972 samples	1x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 55% - Above average

Total price: $100

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $289	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16