Asus H110M-R

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 6% Tree trunk	Desktop 70% Battleship	Workstation 5% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (84th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 16 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 73.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	6.02% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus H110M-R (all builds)
Memory	6.5 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	Цвета: 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20170320
Uptime	1.1 Days
Run Date	Apr 25 '17 at 10:09
Run Duration	84 Seconds
Run User	RUS-User
Background CPU	2%

PC Performing above expectations (84^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Pentium G4600-$27 16,729 User benchmarks, average bench 63% LGA1151, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	73.3% Very good	Memory 91.6 1-Core 115 2-Core 223 82% 143 Pts	4-Core 320 8-Core 320 43% 320 Pts	64-Core 321 20% 321 Pts
Poor: 47% ↑ This bench: 73.3% Great: 72%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD 630 (Desktop Kaby Lake) 153,031 User benchmarks, average bench 5% Asus(1043 8694) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64 Ver. 21.20.16.4534 Performing way above expectations (85^th percentile)	6.02% Terrible	Lighting 6.33 Reflection 9.77 Parallax 6 5% 7.37 fps	MRender 6.38 Gravity 5.27 Splatting 14.3 8% 8.67 fps
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 6.02% Great: 7%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Toshiba DT01ACA050 500GB-$25 163,843 User benchmarks, average bench 75% 243GB free (System drive) Firmware: MS1OA750 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing above expectations (62^nd percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (02) Throughput performance 141 141 72 (03) Spinup time 127 127 12896829620 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 217 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 100 0 (08) Seek timer performance 115 115 34 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 540 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 216 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 217 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 100 100 217 (C2) HDA temperature 187 187 146030198816 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0	83.6% Excellent	Read 148 Write 143 Mixed 143 109% 145 MB/s	4K Read 0.46 4K Write 1.83 4K Mixed 0.15 70% 0.81 MB/s
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 83.6% Great: 103%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston HyperX 2133 C14 1x8GB 30,824 User benchmarks, average bench 37% 1 of 2 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing way above expectations (91^st percentile)	40.6% Average	MC Read 14.5 MC Write 14 MC Mixed 11.1 38% 13.2 GB/s	SC Read 12.1 SC Write 13.8 SC Mixed 13.2 37% 13 GB/s	Latency 64.7 62% 64.7 ns
Poor: 28% ↑ This bench: 40.6% Great: 42%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical H110M-R Builds (Compare 3,536 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 22%

Surfboard

Desktop 73%

Battleship

Workstation 17%

Surfboard

Motherboard: Asus H110M-R

CPU
Core i5-7400Intel $110Bench 64%, 234,266 samples	921x
Core i3-7100Intel $70Bench 57%, 79,299 samples	373x
Core i7-7700Intel $167Bench 76%, 256,717 samples	272x

GPU
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	521x
HD 630 (Desktop Kaby Lake)IntelBench 5%, 153,031 samples	340x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	302x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	245x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	144x
A400 120GBKingston $29Bench 61%, 166,392 samples	120x

RAM
1x8GBAdataBench 41%, 25,310 samples	114x
HyperX 2133 C14 2x8GBKingstonBench 68%, 49,673 samples	93x
HyperX 2133 C14 1x8GBKingstonBench 37%, 30,824 samples	40x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 84% - Excellent

Total price: $197

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16