Asus M4A87TD EVO

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 49%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (51st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 49 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 34.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics22.9% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive56.9% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen.
High background CPU (29%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus M4A87TD EVO  (all builds)
Memory4.5 GB free of 8 GB @ 0.7 GHz
Display1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 8.1
BIOS Date20110308
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 27 '17 at 19:49
Run Duration253 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU 29%

 PC Performing as expected (51st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Athlon II X2 265-$50
AM3, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
34.1% Below average
Memory 56.2
1-Core 43.1
2-Core 75.9
37% 58.4 Pts
4-Core 71
8-Core 74.2
10% 72.6 Pts
64-Core 85.2
5% 85.2 Pts
Poor: 36%
This bench: 34.1%
Great: 50%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD HD 6970
Sapphire(174B E182) 2GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.201.1151.1007
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
22.9% Poor
Lighting 28.9
Reflection 23.8
Parallax 27.3
24% 26.7 fps
MRender 21.5
Gravity 25.9
Splatting 30
22% 25.8 fps
Poor: 17%
This bench: 22.9%
Great: 22%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial M550 256GB-$152
13GB free (System drive)
Firmware: MU01 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
56.9% Above average
Read 310
Write 381
Mixed 175
64% 288 MB/s
4K Read 15.3
4K Write 42.3
4K Mixed 13
62% 23.5 MB/s
DQ Read 27.9
DQ Write 95
DQ Mixed 19.9
27% 47.6 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 56.9%
Great: 113%
Seagate FireCuda 2.5" 1TB-$56
930GB free
Firmware: SDM1 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
45.9% Average
Read 104
Write 55.1
Mixed 70.2
57% 76.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.99
4K Write 3.35
4K Mixed 0.19
125% 1.51 MB/s
Poor: 20%
This bench: 45.9%
Great: 70%
Hitachi HTS543232A7A384 320GB-$40
28GB free
Firmware: ES2OA60W Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing above expectations (85th percentile)
41.1% Average
Read 70.1
Write 73.4
Mixed 12.5
38% 52 MB/s
4K Read 0.29
4K Write 0.88
4K Mixed 0.21
52% 0.46 MB/s
Poor: 8%
This bench: 41.1%
Great: 46%
WD Green 500GB (2009)-$23
26GB free
Firmware: 01.00A01 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing above expectations (85th percentile)
50.3% Above average
Read 88
Write 87.1
Mixed 16.6
46% 63.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.51
4K Write 2.03
4K Mixed 0.3
92% 0.95 MB/s
Poor: 20%
This bench: 50.3%
Great: 54%
HGST HTS 541010A9E680 1TB
10GB free, PID 0237
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
Performing below expectations (26th percentile)
14.8% Very poor
Read 30.3
Write 29
Mixed 8.31
27% 22.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.47
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.17
52% 0.65 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 14.8%
Great: 41%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair CMV4GX3M1A1333C9 CT51264BA160BJ.C8F 8GB
667, 667 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
23.6% Poor
MC Read 10.1
MC Write 5.9
MC Mixed 9.9
25% 8.63 GB/s
SC Read 5.2
SC Write 3.6
SC Mixed 3.7
12% 4.17 GB/s
Latency 139
29% 139 ns
Poor: 24%
This bench: 23.6%
Great: 27%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical M4A87TD EVO Builds (Compare 136 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 20%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 62%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 16%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Asus M4A87TD EVO

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 72% - Very good Total price: $241
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback