Fujitsu ESPRIMO P520

Performance Results


Gaming 8% Tree trunk	Desktop 69% Battle cruiser	Workstation 7% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (27th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 73 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 73.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	6.18% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

System	Fujitsu ESPRIMO P520 (all builds)
Motherboard	FUJITSU D3220-A1
Memory	5.4 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit kleuren, 1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit kleuren
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20150709
Uptime	13.1 Days
Run Date	Apr 28 '17 at 23:21
Run Duration	171 Seconds
Run User	NLD-User
Background CPU	2%

PC Performing below expectations (27^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-4570-$99 129,272 User benchmarks, average bench 62% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	73.8% Very good	Memory 79.2 1-Core 106 2-Core 203 73% 129 Pts	4-Core 394 8-Core 398 53% 396 Pts	64-Core 394 24% 394 Pts
Poor: 46% ↑ This bench: 73.8% Great: 72%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 550-Ti-$250 54,392 User benchmarks, average bench 9% Device(0000 0000) ≥ 4GB CLim: 900 MHz, MLim: 266 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 376.53 Performing way below expectations (1^st percentile)	6.18% Terrible	Lighting 6.97 Reflection 9.38 Parallax 7.25 6% 7.87 fps	MRender 5.1 Gravity 10.9 Splatting 9.61 7% 8.52 fps
Poor: 7% ↑ This bench: 6.18% Great: 9%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100 951,591 User benchmarks, average bench 103% 29GB free Firmware: EMT01B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (15^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 99 99 2652 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 646 (B1) Unknown 99 99 2 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 71 57 29 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (EB) Unknown 99 99 17 (F1) Unknown 99 99 1247498865	87.5% Excellent	Read 491 Write 402 Mixed 415 97% 436 MB/s	4K Read 27.9 4K Write 50.6 4K Mixed 37.4 117% 38.6 MB/s	DQ Read 27.2 DQ Write 262 DQ Mixed 18 51% 102 MB/s
Poor: 72% ↑ This bench: 87.5% Great: 124%
Hitachi HDN726050ALE614 5TB 56 User benchmarks, average bench 93% 785GB free Firmware: APGNW7JH Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (4^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (02) Throughput performance 138 138 100 (03) Spinup time 142 142 38685049296 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 267 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 100 0 (08) Seek timer performance 128 128 18 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 1237 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 267 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 311 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 100 100 311 (C2) HDA temperature 181 181 206159544353 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0	66.4% Good	Read 123 Write 108 Mixed 102 84% 111 MB/s	4K Read 0.61 4K Write 1.56 4K Mixed 0.29 86% 0.82 MB/s
Poor: 67% ↑ This bench: 66.4% Great: 116%
WD Red 3TB (2012)-$78 68,726 User benchmarks, average bench 67% 768GB free Firmware: 82.00A82 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (5^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 0 (03) Spinup time 177 176 6116 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 985 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 200 200 0 (09) Power-on hours count 93 93 5168 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 985 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 16 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 198 198 7173 (C2) HDA temperature 123 110 27 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 253 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 100 253 0	41.2% Average	Read 72.8 Write 70.5 Mixed 70.6 54% 71.3 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.81 4K Mixed 0.25 91% 0.92 MB/s
Poor: 42% ↑ This bench: 41.2% Great: 88%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 500GB-$23 574,344 User benchmarks, average bench 58% 305GB free (System drive) Firmware: FJK3 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing above expectations (63^rd percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 108 99 19532192 (03) Spinup time 100 99 0 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 924 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 82 60 168265856 (09) Power-on hours count 95 95 5233 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 922 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BC) Unknown 100 100 0 (BD) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 72 57 471203868 (C2) HDA temperature 28 43 51539607580 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 45 33 19532192 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (F0) Head flying hours 100 253 -19619410602902 (F1) Unknown 100 253 3796865510 (F2) Unknown 100 253 120589668	63.2% Good	Read 110 Write 110 Mixed 106 82% 109 MB/s	4K Read 0.4 4K Write 1.09 4K Mixed 0.45 87% 0.65 MB/s
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 63.2% Great: 88%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Crucial Ballistix Sport DDR3 1600 C9 2x4GB 44,086 User benchmarks, average bench 56% 2 of 4 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing below potential (5^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	33.4% Below average	MC Read 11.2 MC Write 11.5 MC Mixed 10.1 31% 10.9 GB/s	SC Read 9.6 SC Write 11.2 SC Mixed 11.3 31% 10.7 GB/s	Latency 82 49% 82 ns
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 33.4% Great: 64%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical ESPRIMO P520 Builds (Compare 200 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 7%

Tree trunk

Desktop 61%

Destroyer

Workstation 7%

Tree trunk

System: Fujitsu ESPRIMO P520

CPU
Core i5-4590Intel $188Bench 63%, 151,366 samples	43x
Core i5-4570Intel $99Bench 62%, 129,272 samples	42x
Core i7-4790Intel $135Bench 71%, 255,027 samples	23x

GPU
HD 4600 (Desktop 1.25 GHz)Intel $15Bench 3%, 230,189 samples	48x
GTX 1050Nvidia $101Bench 26%, 269,381 samples	20x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	19x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	11x
A400 120GBKingston $32Bench 61%, 166,392 samples	7x
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $109Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	6x

RAM
M378B5173QH0-CK0 2x4GBSamsungBench 51%, 13,591 samples	14x
M378B5173QH0-CK0 1x4GBSamsungBench 28%, 7,599 samples	14x
HMT451U6BFR8A-PB 2x4GBHynixBench 51%, 8,612 samples	11x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 63% - Good

Total price: $231

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $132	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $186	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $34	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16