PC Status | Overall this PC is performing as expected (41st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 59 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 69%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average. |
Graphics | 49.9% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 78.8% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times. |
Memory | 24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Motherboard | Asus P8P67 EVO (all builds) |
Memory | 12 GB free of 24 GB @ 1.3 GHz |
Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20110627 |
Uptime | 1.1 Days |
Run Date | May 06 '17 at 13:18 |
Run Duration | 140 Seconds |
Run User | FRA-User |
Background CPU | 18% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
Intel Core i7-2600K-$319
LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg)
|
69%
Good
|
|||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
AMD R9 290X-$549
Gigabyte(1458 2281) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1040 MHz, MLim: 1250 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 17.4.1
Performing below potential (44th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
49.9%
Average
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
78.8%
Very good
|
||||
71.7%
Very good
|
||||
46.6%
Average
|
||||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Unknown F3-12800CL8-4GBXM F3-1600C9-8GXM F3-12800CL8-4GBXM F3-1600C9-8GXM 24GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 8192, 4096, 8192 MB
|
47%
Average
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Core i7-2600KIntel $319Bench 71%, 147,533 samples | 236x |
Core i5-2500KIntel $246Bench 66%, 143,007 samples | 125x |
Core i7-2600Intel $197Bench 67%, 185,630 samples | 79x |
GPU | |
---|---|
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples | 43x |
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples | 38x |
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 30x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 72% - Very good | Total price: $666 |