Asrock N68C-GS4 FX

Performance Results


Gaming 3% Tree trunk	Desktop 29% Raft	Workstation 2% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (67th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 33 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 56.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	11.6% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	32.8% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	2GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows however a minimum of 4GB is recommended for gaming or any other RAM intensive tasks such as photo/video editing. This system will also be a little more responsive with 4GB of RAM.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Run History

6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago.

Motherboard	Asrock N68C-GS4 FX (all builds)
Memory	0.7 GB free of 2 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display	1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20141013
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	May 10 '17 at 15:24
Run Duration	369 Seconds
Run User	SVK-User
Background CPU	0%

PC Performing above expectations (67^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD FX-6100-$68 44,863 User benchmarks, average bench 54% CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 3 cores, 6 threads Base clock 3.3 GHz Performing above expectations (82^nd percentile)	56.9% Above average	Memory 80.7 1-Core 53.2 2-Core 104 51% 79.3 Pts	4-Core 190 8-Core 216 26% 203 Pts	64-Core 222 14% 222 Pts
Poor: 41% ↑ This bench: 56.9% Great: 60%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD R7 250E 10,952 User benchmarks, average bench 8% Sapphire(174B A001) 2GB CLim: 925 MHz, MLim: 1125 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 17.4.4 Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	11.6% Very poor	Lighting 14 Reflection 15.7 Parallax 17.2 11% 15.6 fps	MRender 13.2 Gravity 12 Splatting 17.7 12% 14.3 fps
Poor: 7% ↑ This bench: 11.6% Great: 10%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
HyperX Fury 120GB-$160 11,403 User benchmarks, average bench 64% 21GB free (System drive) Firmware: 60AA Relative performance (0^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	32.8% Below average	Read 161 Write 97.8 Mixed 109 27% 123 MB/s	4K Read 14.4 4K Write 50.6 4K Mixed 9.59 61% 24.9 MB/s	DQ Read 19.9 DQ Write 99.3 DQ Mixed 11.3 23% 43.5 MB/s
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 32.8% Great: 75%
Seagate ST3250312AS 250GB-$32 19,180 User benchmarks, average bench 49% 89GB free Firmware: JC45 Performing below expectations (33^rd percentile)	43.8% Average	Read 78 Write 74.5 Mixed 78.9 58% 77.1 MB/s	4K Read 0.63 4K Write 1.75 4K Mixed 0.53 118% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 43.8% Great: 69%
SanDisk Cruzer Blade 8GB 30,139 User benchmarks, average bench 10% 3GB free, PID 5567 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed Performing as expected (53^rd percentile)	9.65% Terrible	Read 19.8 Write 5.02 Mixed 4.37 9% 9.74 MB/s	4K Read 3.44 4K Write 1.59 4K Mixed 0.86 96% 1.96 MB/s
Poor: 6% ↑ This bench: 9.65% Great: 13%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M378B2873EH1-CH9 Hynix HMT112U6BFR8C-H9 2GB 6 User benchmarks, average bench 36% 1066, 1066 MHz 1024, 1024 MB Performing above expectations (67^th percentile)	37.7% Below average	MC Read 14.7 MC Write 12.8 MC Mixed 12.3 38% 13.3 GB/s	SC Read 8.1 SC Write 7.9 SC Mixed 9.6 24% 8.53 GB/s	Latency 79.3 50% 79.3 ns
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 37.7% Great: 48%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical N68C-GS4 FX Builds (Compare 92 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 21%

Surfboard

Desktop 64%

Destroyer

Workstation 16%

Surfboard

Motherboard: Asrock N68C-GS4 FX

CPU
FX-6300AMD $47Bench 55%, 261,607 samples	39x
FX-4300AMD $73Bench 52%, 55,454 samples	8x
FX-8350AMD $130Bench 61%, 313,196 samples	3x

GPU
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	11x
GTX 750-TiNvidia $92Bench 17%, 309,423 samples	6x
Radeon HD 5450AMDBench 1%, 66,079 samples	6x

SSD
0 240GBCt240bx5Bench 50%, 1,468 samples	4x
SSD Plus 240GBSanDisk $28Bench 61%, 133,640 samples	3x
SSDNow V300 120GBKingston $38Bench 54%, 339,020 samples	3x

RAM
99U5471-054.A00LF 2x8GBKingstonBench 53%, 9,823 samples	3x
PSD22G80026 PSD22G80026 4GBUnknownBench 22%, 22 samples	3x
M378B5773CH0-CH9 2x2GBSamsungBench 42%, 3,379 samples	3x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 105% - Outstanding

Total price: $106

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16