Asus MAXIMUS V EXTREME

Performance Results


Gaming 82% Aircraft carrier	Desktop 87% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 68% Battle cruiser


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (64th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 36 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 84%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	95.5% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	38% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago. (Only the first run influences device rankings)

Motherboard	Asus MAXIMUS V EXTREME (all builds)
Memory	4.4 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.9 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20130819
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	May 10 '17 at 18:11
Run Duration	510 Seconds
Run User	IDN-User
Background CPU	0%

Watch Gameplay: 1070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing above expectations (64^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-2600K-$319 147,533 User benchmarks, average bench 71% LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 4.2 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	84% Excellent	Memory 98.1 1-Core 112 2-Core 202 81% 137 Pts	4-Core 379 8-Core 564 59% 471 Pts	64-Core 571 35% 571 Pts
Poor: 56% ↑ This bench: 84% Great: 83%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$132 1,459,281 User benchmarks, average bench 80% Nvidia(10DE 1B81) ≥ 4GB CLim: 2113 MHz, MLim: 2211 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 382.5 Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	95.5% Outstanding	Lighting 122 Reflection 125 Parallax 107 99% 118 fps	MRender 106 Gravity 112 Splatting 105 88% 108 fps
Poor: 71% ↑ This bench: 95.5% Great: 88%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Ocz-vertex2 3.5 120GB 4,046 User benchmarks, average bench 43% 14GB free (System drive) Firmware: 1.37 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing below expectations (29^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 102 100 6773687 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 -8881992360493 (0C) Power cycle count 97 97 3616 (AB) Unknown 0 0 0 (AC) Unknown 0 0 0 (AE) Unknown 0 0 1855 (B1) Unknown 0 0 2 (B5) Unknown 0 0 0 (B6) Unknown 0 0 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (C2) HDA temperature 30 30 128850984990 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 102 100 6773687 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (E7) Temperature 100 100 0 (E9) Unknown 0 0 8704 (EA) Unknown 0 0 6208 (F1) Unknown 0 0 6208 (F2) Unknown 0 0 14400	38% Below average	Read 188 Write 71.5 Mixed 101 26% 120 MB/s	4K Read 19 4K Write 64.8 4K Mixed 9.35 75% 31.1 MB/s	DQ Read 146 DQ Write 61.9 DQ Mixed 30.5 42% 79.4 MB/s
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 38% Great: 55%
WD Red 3TB (2012)-$50 68,726 User benchmarks, average bench 67% 592GB free Firmware: 80.00A80 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (14^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 0 (03) Spinup time 182 177 5858 (04) Start/Stop count 99 99 1891 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 200 200 0 (09) Power-on hours count 77 77 16998 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 1630 (C0) Power-off retract count 199 199 1450 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 200 200 440 (C2) HDA temperature 113 104 37 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 253 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 100 253 0	49.6% Average	Read 83 Write 89.3 Mixed 87.7 65% 86.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.79 4K Write 2.47 4K Mixed 0.24 106% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 42% ↑ This bench: 49.6% Great: 88%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 1TB-$70 337,642 User benchmarks, average bench 54% 652GB free Firmware: CC38 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing above expectations (81^st percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 119 99 213293393 (03) Spinup time 95 95 0 (04) Start/Stop count 94 94 7046 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 76 60 42043084 (09) Power-on hours count 85 85 13894 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 95 95 5126 (B7) Unknown 1 1 198 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BC) Unknown 100 1 167506571912 (BD) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 67 51 555745313 (C2) HDA temperature 33 49 77309411361 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 29 14 213293393 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 104 24094 (F0) Head flying hours 100 253 -41047002425022 (F1) Unknown 100 253 4167207906 (F2) Unknown 100 253 3403765923	63.2% Good	Read 110 Write 110 Mixed 98.7 80% 106 MB/s	4K Read 0.81 4K Write 1.12 4K Mixed 0.62 124% 0.85 MB/s
Poor: 34% ↑ This bench: 63.2% Great: 68%
WD Black 1TB (2010)-$49 257,835 User benchmarks, average bench 57% 309GB free Firmware: 05.01D05 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below expectations (40^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 0 (03) Spinup time 175 171 4208 (04) Start/Stop count 97 97 3179 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 253 0 (09) Power-on hours count 90 90 7911 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 98 98 2640 (C0) Power-off retract count 198 198 1844 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 200 200 1334 (C2) HDA temperature 108 91 39 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 4 (C8) Write error rate 200 200 104	53.5% Above average	Read 91.4 Write 94.7 Mixed 92 70% 92.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.66 4K Write 2.25 4K Mixed 0.38 112% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 53.5% Great: 76%
WD Black 2TB (2013)-$48 144,544 User benchmarks, average bench 89% 123GB free Firmware: 01.01A01 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (11^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 0 (03) Spinup time 184 147 9758 (04) Start/Stop count 99 99 1670 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 200 200 0 (09) Power-on hours count 92 92 6102 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 966 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 524 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 200 200 1145 (C2) HDA temperature 111 97 41 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 200 200 0	66.5% Good	Read 115 Write 117 Mixed 105 84% 112 MB/s	4K Read 0.51 4K Write 2.45 4K Mixed 0.22 91% 1.06 MB/s
Poor: 60% ↑ This bench: 66.5% Great: 112%
WD Black 1TB (2010)-$49 257,835 User benchmarks, average bench 57% 93GB free Firmware: 05.01D05 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below expectations (26^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 199 199 1660 (03) Spinup time 177 171 4150 (04) Start/Stop count 96 96 4507 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 200 200 0 (09) Power-on hours count 84 84 12007 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 97 97 3329 (C0) Power-off retract count 198 198 2077 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 200 200 2429 (C2) HDA temperature 106 91 41 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 58 (C8) Write error rate 200 168 42	48.7% Average	Read 103 Write 66.5 Mixed 80.7 63% 83.3 MB/s	4K Read 0.72 4K Write 2.22 4K Mixed 0.37 113% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 48.7% Great: 76%
WD Black 1TB (2010)-$49 257,835 User benchmarks, average bench 57% 55GB free Firmware: 05.01D05 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way above expectations (89^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 1578 (03) Spinup time 175 170 4216 (04) Start/Stop count 97 97 3325 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 8 (07) Seek error rate 200 200 0 (09) Power-on hours count 90 90 7383 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 98 98 2918 (C0) Power-off retract count 198 198 2049 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 200 200 1277 (C2) HDA temperature 107 93 40 (C4) Reallocation count 193 193 7 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 198 196 513	71.1% Very good	Read 139 Write 109 Mixed 105 88% 117 MB/s	4K Read 0.61 4K Write 2.23 4K Mixed 0.36 107% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 71.1% Great: 76%
SanDisk Cruzer Blade 8GB 30,139 User benchmarks, average bench 10% 6GB free, PID 5567 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed Performing way above expectations (94^th percentile)	12.7% Very poor	Read 22.9 Write 7.44 Mixed 11.8 15% 14 MB/s	4K Read 6.94 4K Write 1.99 4K Mixed 1.55 146% 3.49 MB/s
Poor: 6% ↑ This bench: 12.7% Great: 13%
TOSHIBA TransMemory 8GB 12,066 User benchmarks, average bench 6% 5GB free, PID 6544 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed Performing above expectations (84^th percentile)	7.46% Terrible	Read 34.4 Write 4.91 Mixed 8.98 15% 16.1 MB/s	4K Read 5.81 4K Write 0.008 4K Mixed 0.01 22% 1.95 MB/s
Poor: 4% ↑ This bench: 7.46% Great: 8%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
G.SKILL RipjawsX DDR3 1600 C9 2x4GB 47,852 User benchmarks, average bench 53% 2 of 4 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1867 MHz Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	76.4% Very good	MC Read 28.1 MC Write 27.3 MC Mixed 24.1 76% 26.5 GB/s	SC Read 21.5 SC Write 21 SC Mixed 21.3 61% 21.3 GB/s	Latency 45.8 87% 45.8 ns
Poor: 32% ↑ This bench: 76.4% Great: 62%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical MAXIMUS V EXTREME Builds (Compare 307 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 76%

Battleship

Desktop 80%

Battleship

Workstation 62%

Destroyer

Motherboard: Asus MAXIMUS V EXTREME - $550

CPU
Core i7-3770KIntel $175Bench 72%, 165,979 samples	191x
Core i7-3770Intel $297Bench 69%, 278,207 samples	47x
Core i7-2600KIntel $319Bench 71%, 147,533 samples	20x

GPU
GTX 1080Nvidia $400Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	27x
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	16x
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples	15x

SSD
870 EVO 1TBSamsung $99Bench 112%, 129,044 samples	13x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	10x
850 Evo 1TBSamsung $130Bench 110%, 154,399 samples	8x

RAM
HyperX DDR3 1866 C10 4x8GBKingstonBench 63%, 12,722 samples	10x
TridentX DDR3 2400 C10 4x8GBG.SKILLBench 74%, 7,519 samples	8x
TridentX DDR3 2400 C10 2x8GBG.SKILLBench 67%, 24,592 samples	8x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 63% - Good

Total price: $1,224

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16