Gigabyte GA-770TA-UD3

Performance Results


Gaming 16% Surfboard	Desktop 58% Gunboat	Workstation 12% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (19th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 81 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 49.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics	27.5% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	41.8% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Very high background CPU (80%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

7 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago.

Motherboard	Gigabyte GA-770TA-UD3 (all builds)
Memory	8.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.8 GHz
Display	1600 x 900 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20091119
Uptime	3.4 Days
Run Date	May 19 '17 at 10:52
Run Duration	100 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	80%

PC Performing way below expectations (19^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Phenom II X4 965-$144 43,442 User benchmarks, average bench 53% Socket M2, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.4 GHz Performing below expectations (27^th percentile)	49.6% Average	Memory 82.7 1-Core 43.3 2-Core 42.5 42% 56.2 Pts	4-Core 96.6 8-Core 115 14% 106 Pts	64-Core 169 10% 169 Pts
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 49.6% Great: 61%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD HD 7950-$290 33,820 User benchmarks, average bench 29% Sapphire(174B 3000) 3GB CLim: 925 MHz, MLim: 1250 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 16.12.1 Performing below potential (36^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	27.5% Poor	Lighting 37.9 Reflection 8.27 Parallax 28.7 31% 24.9 fps	MRender 6.33 Gravity 33.1 Splatting 32.9 21% 24.1 fps
Poor: 25% ↑ This bench: 27.5% Great: 32%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100 951,591 User benchmarks, average bench 103% 146GB free (System drive) Firmware: EMT02B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below potential (0^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 99 99 486 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 103 (B1) Unknown 99 99 1 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 68 58 32 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (EB) Unknown 99 99 4 (F1) Unknown 99 99 736239502	41.8% Average	Read 223 Write 175 Mixed 173 42% 190 MB/s	4K Read 21.5 4K Write 31.8 4K Mixed 14.7 68% 22.7 MB/s	DQ Read 30.4 DQ Write 53.8 DQ Mixed 18.5 21% 34.2 MB/s
Poor: 72% ↑ This bench: 41.8% Great: 124%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 4x4GB 106,178 User benchmarks, average bench 43% 4 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM Performing way below expectations (10^th percentile)	28.4% Poor	MC Read 11.2 MC Write 6.8 MC Mixed 11 28% 9.67 GB/s	SC Read 5.1 SC Write 4.2 SC Mixed 7.4 16% 5.57 GB/s	Latency 75.7 53% 75.7 ns
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 28.4% Great: 61%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical GA-770TA-UD3 Builds (Compare 56 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 9%

Tree trunk

Desktop 55%

Gunboat

Workstation 7%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-770TA-UD3

CPU
Phenom II X4 965AMD $144Bench 53%, 43,442 samples	16x
Phenom II X4 955AMD $83Bench 51%, 41,403 samples	14x
Phenom II X6 1090TAMD $240Bench 57%, 23,506 samples	6x

GPU
HD 5770AMDBench 10%, 37,602 samples	6x
R7 250AMDBench 8%, 25,802 samples	4x
Radeon HD 5670AMDBench 6%, 18,196 samples	4x

SSD
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	3x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	3x
SU650 120GBAdata $14Bench 63%, 42,288 samples	3x

RAM
4x2GBUnknownBench 25%, 183,252 samples	15x
4x4GBUnknownBench 43%, 106,178 samples	11x
2x2GBUnknownBench 20%, 446,702 samples	9x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 50% - Above average

Total price: $224

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16