HP 550-233ng

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 13%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 59%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (46th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 54 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 47.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics22% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive43.1% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemHP 550-233ng  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 2B52
Memory10.7 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1024 x 768 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160929
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 19 '17 at 15:13
Run Duration95 Seconds
Run User AUT-User
Background CPU7%

 PC Performing as expected (46th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A10-8750 Radeon R7, 12 Compute Cores 4C+8G
P0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.75 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
47.7% Average
Memory 60.5
1-Core 69.5
2-Core 135
51% 88.3 Pts
4-Core 202
8-Core 206
27% 204 Pts
64-Core 208
13% 208 Pts
Poor: 30%
This bench: 47.7%
Great: 51%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 460-$90
CLim: 1210 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 17.5.2
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
22% Poor
Lighting 25.5
Reflection 31
Parallax 30.2
21% 28.9 fps
MRender 30
Gravity 23.7
Splatting 33.7
24% 29.1 fps
Poor: 17%
This bench: 22%
Great: 22%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SanDisk Extreme 120GB-$160
82GB free (System drive)
Firmware: R211 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
43.1% Average
Read 453
Write 127
Mixed 198
56% 259 MB/s
4K Read 13.3
4K Write 47.8
4K Mixed 7.6
55% 22.9 MB/s
DQ Read 16
DQ Write 42.3
DQ Mixed 7.2
12% 21.9 MB/s
Poor: 50%
This bench: 43.1%
Great: 81%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M378B5173EB0-YK0 M378B1G73EB0-YK0 12GB
1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 8192 MB
Performing below potential (5th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
22.8% Poor
MC Read 8.8
MC Write 6.6
MC Mixed 7.7
22% 7.7 GB/s
SC Read 5.5
SC Write 6.2
SC Mixed 7.7
18% 6.47 GB/s
Latency 126
32% 126 ns
Poor: 24%
This bench: 22.8%
Great: 56%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback