Asrock X370 Gaming K4

Performance Results


Gaming 40% Jet ski	Desktop 82% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 35% Jet ski


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (60th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 40 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 84.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	39.7% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	64.9% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (70%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

6 years ago, 6 years ago.

Motherboard	Asrock X370 Gaming K4 (all builds)
Memory	14.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colori
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20170410
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	May 19 '17 at 21:21
Run Duration	160 Seconds
Run User	ITA-User
Background CPU	70%

PC Performing as expected (60^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 5 1600-$110 392,253 User benchmarks, average bench 70% AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.25 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	84.5% Excellent	Memory 92.1 1-Core 108 2-Core 131 70% 111 Pts	4-Core 415 8-Core 625 65% 520 Pts	64-Core 812 50% 812 Pts
Poor: 61% ↑ This bench: 84.5% Great: 78%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD R9 Fury-X-$781 8,241 User benchmarks, average bench 59% AMD(1002 0B36) CLim: 1000 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 17.5.1 Relative performance (0^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	39.7% Below average	Lighting 39 Reflection 49.7 Parallax 95.9 32% 61.5 fps	MRender 55.9 Gravity 71.6 Splatting 71.5 55% 66.3 fps
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 39.7% Great: 65%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
GOODRAM 480GB 1,234 User benchmarks, average bench 91% 395GB free (System drive) Firmware: SBFM10.6 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (16^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 306 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 54 (A8) Unknown 100 100 0 (AA) Unknown 93 93 420 (AD) Unknown 100 100 2 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 2 (C2) HDA temperature 67 67 141736083489 (DA) Unknown 100 100 0 (E7) Temperature 100 100 100 (F1) Unknown 100 100 312	64.9% Good	Read 314 Write 448 Mixed 462 92% 408 MB/s	4K Read 25.7 4K Write 54.8 4K Mixed 9.82 80% 30.1 MB/s	DQ Read 29.4 DQ Write 62.7 DQ Mixed 9.98 18% 34 MB/s
Poor: 53% ↑ This bench: 64.9% Great: 130%
Toshiba P300 3TB-$100 74,038 User benchmarks, average bench 87% 2TB free Firmware: MX6OACF0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (02) Throughput performance 139 139 70 (03) Spinup time 214 214 34374680883 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 366 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 100 0 (08) Seek timer performance 124 124 33 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 1226 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 210 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 366 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 100 100 366 (C2) HDA temperature 200 200 214749413406 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0	117% Outstanding	Read 202 Write 205 Mixed 171 144% 193 MB/s	4K Read 1.1 4K Write 1.86 4K Mixed 0.19 101% 1.05 MB/s
Poor: 56% ↑ This bench: 117% Great: 108%
Kingston HyperX Fury 3.0 32GB 667 User benchmarks, average bench 24% 25GB free, PID 16a5 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed Performing above expectations (63^rd percentile)	31.1% Below average	Read 147 Write 36.1 Mixed 38.1 72% 73.6 MB/s	4K Read 4.26 4K Write 0.31 4K Mixed 0.83 55% 1.8 MB/s
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 31.1% Great: 41%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
G.SKILL F4 DDR4 3600 C16 2x8GB 11,301 User benchmarks, average bench 96% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 2134 MHz clocked @ 1067 MHz Performing below potential (21^st percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	81.6% Excellent	MC Read 30.6 MC Write 29.7 MC Mixed 27.2 83% 29.2 GB/s	SC Read 18.9 SC Write 28.6 SC Mixed 22.7 67% 23.4 GB/s	Latency 63.8 63% 63.8 ns
Poor: 66% ↑ This bench: 81.6% Great: 124%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical X370 Gaming K4 Builds (Compare 196 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 75%

Battleship

Desktop 76%

Battleship

Workstation 73%

Battleship

Motherboard: Asrock X370 Gaming K4

CPU
Ryzen 7 1700AMD $195Bench 69%, 144,475 samples	43x
Ryzen 7 1700XAMD $225Bench 71%, 66,470 samples	24x
Ryzen 5 1600AMD $110Bench 70%, 392,253 samples	23x

GPU
GTX 1080Nvidia $400Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	19x
GTX 1080-TiNvidia $485Bench 124%, 840,268 samples	16x
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	16x

SSD
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $109Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	8x
XPG SX8200 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBAdata $80Bench 279%, 85,928 samples	8x
960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GBSamsung $45Bench 199%, 240,629 samples	6x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $40Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	11x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GBCorsair $43Bench 82%, 606,405 samples	7x
2x8GBUnknownBench 64%, 236,291 samples	6x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 65% - Good

Total price: $744

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

Asrock X370 Gaming K4

Performance Results

Run History

PC Performing as expected (60th percentile)

System Memory Latency Ladder

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

Motherboard: Asrock X370 Gaming K4

Feedback

PC Performing as expected (60^th percentile)