ADD TO PC
BUILD

Fujitsu PRIMERGY TX200 S5

Performance Results


Gaming 31% Sail boat	Desktop 79% Battleship	Workstation 28% Raft


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (56th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 44 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 76.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	36.1% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	42.2% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

System	Fujitsu PRIMERGY TX200 S5 (all builds)
Motherboard	FUJITSU D2709
Memory	22 GB free of 24 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit Farben
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20130204
Uptime	0.3 Days
Run Date	May 20 '17 at 08:29
Run Duration	118 Seconds
Run User	DEU-User
Background CPU	1%

PC Performing as expected (56^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
1st CPU: Intel Xeon X5570 2,341 User benchmarks, average bench 69% CPU 1, 2 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 2.95 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	76.4% Very good	Memory 92.9 1-Core 84.1 2-Core 170 69% 115 Pts	4-Core 325 8-Core 474 50% 400 Pts	64-Core 824 51% 824 Pts
Poor: 58% ↑ This bench: 76.4% Great: 76%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 770-$279 116,895 User benchmarks, average bench 34% Asus(1043 8465) 2GB CLim: 1215 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 378.78 Performing way above expectations (93^rd percentile)	36.1% Below average	Lighting 43.2 Reflection 39.4 Parallax 51.6 35% 44.7 fps	MRender 55 Gravity 50.6 Splatting 36.9 38% 47.5 fps
Poor: 32% ↑ This bench: 36.1% Great: 36%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 120GB-$80 69,224 User benchmarks, average bench 96% 91GB free Firmware: EMT02B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (5^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 99 99 632 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 944 (B1) Unknown 98 98 25 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 65 46 35 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (EB) Unknown 99 99 61 (F1) Unknown 99 99 6096308702	62.6% Good	Read 372 Write 272 Mixed 293 69% 313 MB/s	4K Read 15.1 4K Write 19.5 4K Mixed 27.4 68% 20.7 MB/s	DQ Read 245 DQ Write 150 DQ Mixed 91 96% 162 MB/s
Poor: 64% ↑ This bench: 62.6% Great: 115%
Samsung 850 Pro 128GB-$70 18,195 User benchmarks, average bench 99% 65GB free (System drive) Firmware: EXM01B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below potential (0^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 98 98 8848 (0C) Power cycle count 98 98 1680 (B1) Unknown 98 98 93 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 66 55 34 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (EB) Unknown 99 99 37 (F1) Unknown 99 99 24079230448	42.2% Average	Read 222 Write 183 Mixed 214 46% 206 MB/s	4K Read 12.7 4K Write 25.8 4K Mixed 20.9 60% 19.8 MB/s	DQ Read 38.1 DQ Write 101 DQ Mixed 24.3 32% 54.5 MB/s
Poor: 71% ↑ This bench: 42.2% Great: 119%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 6x4GB 28,320 User benchmarks, average bench 47% 6 of 18 slots used 24GB DIMM Performing way above expectations (85^th percentile)	55.1% Above average	MC Read 22.9 MC Write 17.6 MC Mixed 20.2 58% 20.2 GB/s	SC Read 12.7 SC Write 7.7 SC Mixed 9.3 28% 9.9 GB/s	Latency 62.4 64% 62.4 ns
Poor: 36% ↑ This bench: 55.1% Great: 61%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

The Best.

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission

Today's hottest

Amazon Ebay

deals

CPU GPU SSD HDD USB RAM MBD

Build

Test

EFps

Can You Run It?

►
YouTube
*NEW*

About • User Guide • FAQs • Email • Privacy • Developer • YouTube Feedback