HP PPPPP-CCC#MMMMMMMM

Performance Results


Gaming 10% Tree trunk	Desktop 69% Battle cruiser	Workstation 8% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (58th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 42 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 72.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	7.62% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	46.3% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

6 years ago, 6 years ago.

System	HP PPPPP-CCC#MMMMMMMM (all builds)
Motherboard	MSI IONA
Memory	5.8 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20100625
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	May 20 '17 at 15:07
Run Duration	154 Seconds
Run User	SVN-User
Background CPU	2%

PC Performing as expected (58^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7 870-$100 37,228 User benchmarks, average bench 66% CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2.95 GHz, turbo 3.15 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (92^nd percentile)	72.4% Very good	Memory 94 1-Core 88.7 2-Core 168 70% 117 Pts	4-Core 277 8-Core 389 42% 333 Pts	64-Core 391 24% 391 Pts
Poor: 53% ↑ This bench: 72.4% Great: 74%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD R7 250 25,802 User benchmarks, average bench 8% Gigabyte(1458 22BF) 2GB CLim: 1100 MHz, MLim: 800 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 17.4.4 Performing above expectations (66^th percentile)	7.62% Terrible	Lighting 9.57 Reflection 11 Parallax 14.3 8% 11.6 fps	MRender 6.9 Gravity 10.4 Splatting 9.13 7% 8.81 fps
Poor: 7% ↑ This bench: 7.62% Great: 9%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100 951,591 User benchmarks, average bench 103% 190GB free (System drive) Firmware: EMT01B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below potential (0^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 97 97 15030 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 110 (B1) Unknown 97 97 58 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 57 43 43 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (EB) Unknown 99 99 18 (F1) Unknown 99 99 23704503799	46.3% Average	Read 269 Write 213 Mixed 218 52% 233 MB/s	4K Read 17.5 4K Write 44.1 4K Mixed 15.4 70% 25.7 MB/s	DQ Read 23.3 DQ Write 49.1 DQ Mixed 15.7 18% 29.3 MB/s
Poor: 72% ↑ This bench: 46.3% Great: 124%
Samsung HD502IJ 500GB-$40 25,285 User benchmarks, average bench 43% 313GB free Firmware: 1AA01112 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing as expected (58^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (03) Spinup time 86 86 5230 (04) Start/Stop count 83 83 17237 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 3 (07) Seek error rate 100 100 0 (08) Seek timer performance 100 100 9701 (09) Power-on hours count 88 88 58882 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 98 98 2060 (0D) Soft read error rate 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BC) Unknown 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 70 54 572391454 (C2) HDA temperature 73 51 588840987 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 100 100 67115 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 1 (C8) Write error rate 100 98 0 (C9) Soft read error rate 253 253 0	43.9% Average	Read 74 Write 78.7 Mixed 79.6 58% 77.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.4 4K Write 2.32 4K Mixed 0.38 102% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 43.9% Great: 59%
WD WD1001FAES-60Z2A0 1TB 11,642 User benchmarks, average bench 57% 128GB free Firmware: 06.01D06 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing as expected (42^nd percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 0 (03) Spinup time 173 166 4325 (04) Start/Stop count 86 86 14861 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 253 0 (09) Power-on hours count 41 41 43215 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 1241 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BC) Unknown 100 97 81605623828 (BE) vendor-specific 65 46 723583011 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 185 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 196 196 14675 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 200 200 0	55% Above average	Read 111 Write 80.2 Mixed 98.5 73% 96.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.52 4K Write 1.84 4K Mixed 0.23 81% 0.86 MB/s
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 55% Great: 75%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
CE80CE80 M378B5773CH0-CH9 4x2GB 91 User benchmarks, average bench 36% 4 of 4 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR3 1333 MHz Performing way above expectations (87^th percentile)	41.2% Average	MC Read 15.9 MC Write 12.6 MC Mixed 12.3 39% 13.6 GB/s	SC Read 11.8 SC Write 10.7 SC Mixed 12.6 33% 11.7 GB/s	Latency 59.7 67% 59.7 ns
Poor: 28% ↑ This bench: 41.2% Great: 42%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical PPPPP-CCC#MMMMMMMM Builds (Compare 241 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 5%

Tree trunk

Desktop 46%

Yacht

Workstation 5%

Tree trunk

System: HP PPPPP-CCC#MMMMMMMM

CPU
Core i5 650Intel $70Bench 46%, 42,063 samples	49x
Core i3 550Intel $110Bench 47%, 19,058 samples	41x
Core i7 860Intel $339Bench 64%, 51,451 samples	39x

GPU
HD Graphics (Clarkdale 0.733/0.9 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 20,588 samples	29x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	15x
GeForce GT 730NvidiaBench 5%, 164,888 samples	14x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	9x
A400 120GBKingston $29Bench 61%, 166,392 samples	6x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	5x

RAM
M378B5673EH1-CH9 4x2GBCE80CE80Bench 39%, 417 samples	7x
HMT351U6EFR8C-PB HMT125U6TFR8C-H9 HMT125U6TFR8C-H9 8GBAD80AD80Bench 42%, 11 samples	7x
M378B5673FH0-CH9 4x2GBCE80CE80Bench 38%, 285 samples	5x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 54% - Above average

Total price: $98

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $179	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16