Dell Precision T3600

Performance Results


Gaming 30% Raft	Desktop 80% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 26% Raft


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (72nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 28 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 72.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	29.2% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	84.2% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (37%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

6 years ago, 6 years ago.

System	Dell Precision T3600
Motherboard	Dell Precision T3600 (all builds)
Memory	13.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20140929
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	May 23 '17 at 16:32
Run Duration	116 Seconds
Run User	SWE-User
Background CPU	37%

PC Performing above expectations (72^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Xeon E5-1620 0-$345 17,464 User benchmarks, average bench 70% CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.65 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (81^st percentile)	72.8% Very good	Memory 91.7 1-Core 87.6 2-Core 171 70% 117 Pts	4-Core 292 8-Core 498 48% 395 Pts	64-Core 499 31% 499 Pts
Poor: 61% ↑ This bench: 72.8% Great: 77%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-$101 269,381 User benchmarks, average bench 26% Asus(1043 85C7) CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 382.33 Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	29.2% Poor	Lighting 36.4 Reflection 25.9 Parallax 31.8 30% 31.4 fps	MRender 37.7 Gravity 34.1 Splatting 32.7 28% 34.8 fps
Poor: 24% ↑ This bench: 29.2% Great: 28%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Liteonit LCS-256M6S 2.5 7mm 256GB 11,477 User benchmarks, average bench 83% 137GB free (System drive) Firmware: 10C Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing as expected (55^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 519 (AF) Unknown 100 100 0 (B0) Unknown 100 100 8 (B1) Unknown 100 100 1404165 (B2) Unknown 100 100 8 (B3) Unknown 100 100 9 (B4) Unknown 100 100 480 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 8 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 1 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 100 100 0 (F1) Unknown 100 100 258824 (F2) Unknown 100 100 250868	84.2% Excellent	Read 481 Write 407 Mixed 432 98% 440 MB/s	4K Read 30.7 4K Write 69.7 4K Mixed 31.9 124% 44.1 MB/s	DQ Read 29.9 DQ Write 61.8 DQ Mixed 12.1 19% 34.6 MB/s
Poor: 61% ↑ This bench: 84.2% Great: 101%
Hitachi HTS545050B9A300 500GB-$71 21,137 User benchmarks, average bench 33% 232GB free Firmware: C60F Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing as expected (48^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (02) Throughput performance 100 100 0 (03) Spinup time 160 160 77309411329 (04) Start/Stop count 99 99 3095 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 100 0 (08) Seek timer performance 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 92 92 3904 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 2562 (BF) G-sense error rate 100 100 0 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 47 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 94 94 67446 (C2) HDA temperature 220 220 249109086233 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (DF) Load/unload retry count 100 100 0	33.1% Below average	Read 58.4 Write 56.7 Mixed 60.7 44% 58.6 MB/s	4K Read 0.37 4K Write 1.17 4K Mixed 0.23 63% 0.59 MB/s
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 33.1% Great: 45%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung-00CE M393B5273DH0-CK0 4x4GB 1,049 User benchmarks, average bench 85% 4 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR3 1600 MHz Performing above expectations (77^th percentile)	94% Outstanding	MC Read 35.4 MC Write 39.6 MC Mixed 35.4 105% 36.8 GB/s	SC Read 15.5 SC Write 12.8 SC Mixed 12.8 39% 13.7 GB/s	Latency 64.6 62% 64.6 ns
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 94% Great: 98%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Precision T3600 Builds (Compare 2,850 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 13%

Tree trunk

Desktop 67%

Battle cruiser

Workstation 12%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: Dell Precision T3600

CPU
Xeon E5-1620 0Intel $345Bench 70%, 17,464 samples	1,062x
Xeon E5-1650 0Intel $230Bench 73%, 10,189 samples	444x
Xeon E5-1603 0IntelBench 60%, 3,589 samples	237x

GPU
Quadro 2000NvidiaBench 6%, 15,855 samples	162x
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	137x
Quadro 4000NvidiaBench 7%, 8,609 samples	117x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	83x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	62x
870 EVO 1TBSamsung $89Bench 112%, 129,044 samples	48x

RAM
M393B5273DH0-CK0 4x4GBSamsung-00CEBench 85%, 1,049 samples	147x
HMT351R7CFR8C-PB 4x4GBHynix-00ADBench 83%, 808 samples	130x
M393B1K70DH0-CK0 4x8GBSamsung-00CEBench 79%, 545 samples	73x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 62% - Good

Total price: $373

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16