Asus P8Z77-V

Performance Results


Gaming 38% Jet ski	Desktop 92% Nuclear submarine	Workstation 31% Sail boat


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (75th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 25 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 88.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	37.2% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	99.4% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Motherboard	Asus P8Z77-V (all builds)
Memory	5.6 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.9 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20130813
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	May 25 '17 at 03:44
Run Duration	144 Seconds
Run User	CAN-User
Background CPU	2%

PC Performing above expectations (75^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-2500K-$246 143,007 User benchmarks, average bench 66% LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 4.5 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	88.9% Excellent	Memory 96.9 1-Core 119 2-Core 238 86% 151 Pts	4-Core 467 8-Core 473 63% 470 Pts	64-Core 478 30% 478 Pts
Poor: 44% ↑ This bench: 88.9% Great: 79%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD R9 285-$189 6,276 User benchmarks, average bench 32% Gigabyte(1458 229D) 2GB CLim: 1000 MHz, MLim: 1375 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 17.5.2 Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	37.2% Below average	Lighting 47.1 Reflection 52.2 Parallax 55.1 38% 51.5 fps	MRender 50.4 Gravity 40.5 Splatting 38.9 35% 43.3 fps
Poor: 28% ↑ This bench: 37.2% Great: 34%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 840 Pro 256GB-$190 73,119 User benchmarks, average bench 95% 181GB free (System drive) Firmware: DXM06B0Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing as expected (57^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 99 99 2377 (0C) Power cycle count 95 95 4452 (B1) Unknown 98 98 54 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 74 62 26 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 99 99 69 (EB) Unknown 99 99 1150 (F1) Unknown 99 99 13971739627	99.4% Outstanding	Read 517 Write 451 Mixed 508 110% 492 MB/s	4K Read 28.4 4K Write 102 4K Mixed 25.7 130% 51.9 MB/s	DQ Read 314 DQ Write 255 DQ Mixed 88.9 120% 219 MB/s
Poor: 68% ↑ This bench: 99.4% Great: 116%
OCZ VERTEX3 60GB 3,574 User benchmarks, average bench 60% 28GB free Firmware: 2.15 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (19^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 92 92 3790283 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 94 94 -48052094101854 (0C) Power cycle count 96 96 4909 (AB) Unknown 0 0 0 (AC) Unknown 0 0 0 (AE) Unknown 0 0 374 (B1) Unknown 0 0 0 (B5) Unknown 0 0 0 (B6) Unknown 0 0 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (C2) HDA temperature 30 30 128850984990 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 120 120 3790283 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C9) Soft read error rate 120 120 3790283 (CC) Soft ECC correction 120 120 3790283 (E6) GMR head amplitude 100 100 100 (E7) Temperature 100 100 0 (E9) Unknown 0 0 1973 (EA) Unknown 0 0 2441 (F1) Unknown 0 0 2441 (F2) Unknown 0 0 5227	52.6% Above average	Read 374 Write 75.8 Mixed 116 41% 189 MB/s	4K Read 25 4K Write 77.3 4K Mixed 16.4 100% 39.6 MB/s	DQ Read 98 DQ Write 75.3 DQ Mixed 30.7 38% 68 MB/s
Poor: 44% ↑ This bench: 52.6% Great: 70%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$28 1,562,409 User benchmarks, average bench 89% 625GB free Firmware: CC45 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing above expectations (83^rd percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 115 99 91430520 (03) Spinup time 97 97 0 (04) Start/Stop count 98 98 2299 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 72 60 20610394 (09) Power-on hours count 98 98 2169 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 98 98 2202 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BC) Unknown 100 100 0 (BD) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 74 69 454688794 (BF) G-sense error rate 100 100 0 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 131 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 85 85 31301 (C2) HDA temperature 26 40 55834574874 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (F0) Head flying hours 100 253 26830660699341 (F1) Unknown 100 253 5037283281 (F2) Unknown 100 253 78572668912	105% Outstanding	Read 186 Write 182 Mixed 179 137% 182 MB/s	4K Read 0.87 4K Write 1.83 4K Mixed 0.22 95% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 55% ↑ This bench: 105% Great: 112%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
HyperX Fury DDR3 1866 C10 2x4GB-$35 38,490 User benchmarks, average bench 51% 2 of 4 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1867 MHz Performing way above expectations (93^rd percentile)	65.4% Good	MC Read 23.7 MC Write 23.3 MC Mixed 19.4 63% 22.1 GB/s	SC Read 19.3 SC Write 21.5 SC Mixed 19.9 58% 20.2 GB/s	Latency 50.8 79% 50.8 ns
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 65.4% Great: 67%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical P8Z77-V Builds (Compare 2,109 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 44%

Speed boat

Desktop 79%

Battleship

Workstation 36%

Jet ski

Motherboard: Asus P8Z77-V

CPU
Core i7-3770KIntel $175Bench 72%, 165,979 samples	748x
Core i5-3570KIntel $136Bench 68%, 185,516 samples	508x
Core i7-3770Intel $297Bench 69%, 278,207 samples	382x

GPU
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	150x
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples	145x
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	123x

SSD
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	75x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	70x
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $109Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	66x

RAM
Vengeance DDR3 1600 C9 4x4GBCorsairBench 53%, 34,385 samples	58x
Vengeance DDR3 1600 C9 4x4GBCorsairBench 53%, 20,667 samples	55x
HyperX DDR3 1600 C9 4x4GBKingstonBench 56%, 28,461 samples	53x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 74% - Very good

Total price: $391

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16