| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (37th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 63 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
| Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 63.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average. |
| Graphics | 36.2% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | 50.3% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications. |
| Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Sub-optimal background CPU (11%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
| Motherboard | Asrock 970 Pro3 R2.0 (all builds) |
| Memory | 11.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 0.7 GHz |
| Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit cores |
| OS | Windows 10 |
| BIOS Date | 20121017 |
| Uptime | 1.9 Days |
| Run Date | May 25 '17 at 15:28 |
| Run Duration | 185 Seconds |
| Run User | COL-User |
| Background CPU | 11% |
PC Performing below expectations (37th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
63.6%
Good
|
59% 95.3 Pts
|
40% 332 Pts
|
26% 424 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
AMD R9 380-$200
CLim: 980 MHz, MLim: 1475 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 17.1.1
|
36.2%
Below average
|
37% 52 fps
|
34% 42.7 fps
| |
| Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Kingston SSDNow UV400 240GB-$89
52GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 0C3FD6SD Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
|
50.3%
Above average
|
63% 288 MB/s
|
55% 17 MB/s
|
37% 74.3 MB/s
|
|
|
77.4%
Very good
|
86% 116 MB/s
|
70% 0.79 MB/s
| |
|
|
49.3%
Average
|
50% 68.7 MB/s
|
132% 1.13 MB/s
| |
|
Samsung M3 Portable 1TB
7GB free, PID 61b6
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
|
18.2%
Very poor
|
46% 36.2 MB/s
|
53% 0.63 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Unknown 16GB
667, 800 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing below potential (9th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
26.6%
Poor
|
23% 8.17 GB/s
|
25% 8.7 GB/s
|
54% 74.3 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical 970 Pro3 R2.0 Builds (Compare 787 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: Asrock 970 Pro3 R2.0 - $18
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| FX-6300AMD $47Bench 55%, 261,607 samples | 193x |
| FX-8350AMD $130Bench 61%, 313,196 samples | 191x |
| FX-8320AMD $129Bench 59%, 106,454 samples | 102x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 63x |
| GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples | 53x |
| RX 580AMD $130Bench 52%, 360,351 samples | 33x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 88% - Excellent | Total price: $152 |