Gigabyte GA-H270-Gaming 3

Performance Results


Gaming 14% Tree trunk	Desktop 77% Battleship	Workstation 11% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (72nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 28 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 66%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	12.9% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	265% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Motherboard	Gigabyte GA-H270-Gaming 3 (all builds)
Memory	5.3 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	1920x1080x4294967296 szín
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20170424
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	May 26 '17 at 16:52
Run Duration	230 Seconds
Run User	HUN-User
Background CPU	5%

PC Performing above expectations (72^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Pentium G4560-$31 70,054 User benchmarks, average bench 57% U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (93^rd percentile)	66% Good	Memory 83.5 1-Core 105 2-Core 197 74% 129 Pts	4-Core 279 8-Core 302 38% 291 Pts	64-Core 273 17% 273 Pts
Poor: 39% ↑ This bench: 66% Great: 68%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD HD 7770 38,053 User benchmarks, average bench 12% Asus(1043 045D) 1GB CLim: 980 MHz, MLim: 1120 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 17.5.2 Performing way above expectations (87^th percentile)	12.9% Very poor	Lighting 15.8 Reflection 16 Parallax 21.8 13% 17.9 fps	MRender 13.3 Gravity 14.6 Splatting 18.3 13% 15.4 fps
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 12.9% Great: 14%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 830 Series 640GB 3 User benchmarks, average bench 10% 487GB free Firmware: 01.03B01 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 0 (03) Spinup time 165 161 4750 (04) Start/Stop count 91 91 9960 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 253 0 (09) Power-on hours count 65 65 25867 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 96 96 4109 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 652 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 197 197 9960 (C2) HDA temperature 118 103 29 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 3 (C8) Write error rate 200 200 0	9.92% Terrible	Read 113 Write 78.5 Mixed 88.4 21% 93.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.47 4K Write 1.78 4K Mixed 0.35 2% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 10% ↑ This bench: 9.92% Great: 10%
Samsung 960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$43 165,668 User benchmarks, average bench 213% 367GB free (System drive) Firmware: 2B7Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	265% Outstanding	Read 2,735 Write 1,334 Mixed 1,427 402% 1,832 MB/s	4K Read 58 4K Write 124 4K Mixed 47.1 214% 76.5 MB/s	DQ Read 169 DQ Write 270 DQ Mixed 83.1 101% 174 MB/s
Poor: 153% ↑ This bench: 265% Great: 254%
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100 951,591 User benchmarks, average bench 103% 113GB free Firmware: EMT02B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing as expected (44^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 99 99 641 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 326 (B1) Unknown 99 99 8 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 68 58 32 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (EB) Unknown 99 99 155 (F1) Unknown 99 99 4878626612	104% Outstanding	Read 510 Write 406 Mixed 405 98% 440 MB/s	4K Read 38.2 4K Write 89.3 4K Mixed 43.1 160% 56.9 MB/s	DQ Read 179 DQ Write 237 DQ Mixed 89.5 101% 169 MB/s
Poor: 72% ↑ This bench: 104% Great: 124%
Samsung 830 64GB 4,094 User benchmarks, average bench 53% 50GB free Firmware: CXM03B1Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing as expected (49^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 99 99 2365 (0C) Power cycle count 98 98 1106 (B1) Unknown 97 97 78 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 71 61 29 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 253 253 1 (EB) Unknown 99 99 289 (F1) Unknown 99 99 4418329270	52.6% Above average	Read 500 Write 155 Mixed 238 65% 298 MB/s	4K Read 21.6 4K Write 30.9 4K Mixed 10.8 63% 21.1 MB/s	DQ Read 181 DQ Write 35.5 DQ Mixed 30 42% 82.1 MB/s
Poor: 41% ↑ This bench: 52.6% Great: 63%
OCZ CACHE-SYNAPSE 32GB 111 User benchmarks, average bench 39% 27GB free Firmware: 2.15 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing above expectations (68^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 120 120 0 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 83 83 -49752901141838 (0C) Power cycle count 98 98 2558 (AB) Unknown 0 0 0 (AC) Unknown 0 0 0 (AE) Unknown 0 0 313 (B1) Unknown 0 0 1 (B5) Unknown 0 0 0 (B6) Unknown 0 0 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (C2) HDA temperature 30 30 128850984990 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 100 100 0 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C9) Soft read error rate 100 100 0 (CC) Soft ECC correction 100 100 0 (E6) GMR head amplitude 100 100 100 (E7) Temperature 100 100 0 (E9) Unknown 0 0 1745 (EA) Unknown 0 0 2249 (F1) Unknown 0 0 2249 (F2) Unknown 0 0 4491	41% Average	Read 199 Write 65 Mixed 91.5 26% 118 MB/s	4K Read 27.1 4K Write 66.1 4K Mixed 11.6 91% 34.9 MB/s	DQ Read 78.6 DQ Write 61.8 DQ Mixed 25 31% 55.1 MB/s
Poor: 28% ↑ This bench: 41% Great: 50%
Seagate ST3500320AS 2TB 10 User benchmarks, average bench 80% 1.5TB free Firmware: MX4OABB0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way above expectations (90^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (02) Throughput performance 100 100 0 (03) Spinup time 134 134 25789464842 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 16 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 100 0 (08) Seek timer performance 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 6 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 16 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 25 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 100 100 25 (C2) HDA temperature 206 206 141735493661 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0	102% Outstanding	Read 177 Write 179 Mixed 159 129% 171 MB/s	4K Read 1.1 4K Write 1.86 4K Mixed 0.18 100% 1.05 MB/s
Poor: 57% ↑ This bench: 102% Great: 102%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Crucial CT8G4DFS824A.C8FAD1 1x8GB 1,337 User benchmarks, average bench 40% 1 of 4 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz Performing as expected (44^th percentile)	39.1% Below average	MC Read 14.8 MC Write 14 MC Mixed 11.1 38% 13.3 GB/s	SC Read 8.8 SC Write 11.9 SC Mixed 11.4 31% 10.7 GB/s	Latency 74.3 54% 74.3 ns
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 39.1% Great: 46%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical GA-H270-Gaming 3 Builds (Compare 1,299 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 48%

Yacht

Desktop 83%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 41%

Speed boat

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-H270-Gaming 3

CPU
Core i7-7700Intel $167Bench 76%, 256,717 samples	349x
Core i5-7500Intel $89Bench 67%, 149,467 samples	203x
Core i7-7700KIntel $230Bench 84%, 712,312 samples	199x

GPU
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	197x
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	152x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	132x

SSD
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	57x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	33x
A400 120GBKingston $30Bench 61%, 166,392 samples	31x

RAM
HyperX 2400 C15 2x8GBKingstonBench 76%, 122,822 samples	60x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 2400 C14 2x8GBCorsair $42Bench 73%, 66,222 samples	39x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 2400 C16 2x8GBCorsair $42Bench 76%, 105,447 samples	25x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 76% - Very good

Total price: $383

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16