JW JW-A880GMT-EXTREME

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 48%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 1%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (59th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 41 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 52.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics6.65% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Run History
MotherboardJW JW-A880GMT-EXTREME  (all builds)
Memory1.3 GB free of 4 GB @ 0.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20100719
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 02 '17 at 21:26
Run Duration95 Seconds
Run User MKD-User
Background CPU10%

 PC Performing as expected (59th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Phenom II X4 955-$83
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
52.4% Above average
Memory 78.6
1-Core 47.6
2-Core 94.9
48% 73.7 Pts
4-Core 151
8-Core 171
21% 161 Pts
64-Core 183
11% 183 Pts
Poor: 38%
This bench: 52.4%
Great: 60%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 5670
Sapphire(174B E151) 1GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 8.982.0.0
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
6.65% Terrible
Lighting 7.8
Reflection 8.85
Parallax 6.12
6% 7.59 fps
MRender 9
Gravity 5.17
Splatting 11.3
7% 8.49 fps
Poor: 5%
This bench: 6.65%
Great: 6%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Hitachi Deskstar 7K1000.C 1TB-$40
584GB free (System drive)
Firmware: JP4OA3EA Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing below expectations (40th percentile)
53.7% Above average
Read 92.9
Write 94.6
Mixed 29.9
53% 72.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.12
4K Write 0.31
4K Mixed 0.13
26% 0.19 MB/s
Poor: 30%
This bench: 53.7%
Great: 74%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 1x4GB
1 of 4 slots used
4GB DIMM 667 MHz
Performing as expected (46th percentile)
23.9% Poor
MC Read 8.9
MC Write 6.7
MC Mixed 7.4
22% 7.67 GB/s
SC Read 7.2
SC Write 6.1
SC Mixed 5.7
18% 6.33 GB/s
Latency 83.2
48% 83.2 ns
Poor: 13%
This bench: 23.9%
Great: 52%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $179Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback