Medion Erazer X7841 MD99556

Performance Results


Gaming 2% Tree trunk	Desktop 48% Yacht	Workstation 2% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (35th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 65 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 54.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	1.29% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	46.2% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (52%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU. CPU throttled at 61% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.

Run History

7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 6 years ago.

System	Medion Erazer X7841 MD99556 (all builds)
Motherboard	MEDION P670RE1M
Memory	1.6 GB free of 4 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben,
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20160516
Uptime	21.4 Days
Run Date	Jun 04 '17 at 21:32
Run Duration	162 Seconds
Run User	AUT-User
Background CPU	52%
CPU Throttled	61%

PC Performing below expectations (35^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-6700HQ 320,434 User benchmarks, average bench 59% U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 1.6 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (23^rd percentile)	54.2% Above average	Memory 77 1-Core 50.7 2-Core 91.1 48% 72.9 Pts	4-Core 172 8-Core 282 28% 227 Pts	64-Core 283 18% 283 Pts
Poor: 34% ↑ This bench: 54.2% Great: 69%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD 530 (Mobile Skylake) FAQ - How to force Optimus or Switchable discrete GPUs? Clevo(1558 6540) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64 Ver. 21.20.16.4534 Relative performance (0^th percentile)	1.29% Terrible	Lighting 1.33 Reflection 11.5 Parallax 1.25 1% 4.71 fps	MRender 2 Gravity 1.1 Splatting 2.78 2% 1.96 fps
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 1.29% Great: 6%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung MZNLF128HCHP-00000 128GB 6,038 User benchmarks, average bench 47% 18GB free (System drive) Firmware: FXT2101Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing as expected (49^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 99 99 1718 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 947 (AA) Unknown 100 100 0 (AB) Unknown 100 100 0 (AC) Unknown 100 100 0 (AD) Unknown 97 97 49 (AE) Unknown 99 99 31 (B2) Unknown 100 100 0 (B4) Unknown 100 100 1064 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (C2) HDA temperature 58 46 42 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (E9) Unknown 97 97 16366173 (F1) Unknown 99 99 4474 (F2) Unknown 99 99 7687 (F9) Unknown 99 99 6272	46.2% Average	Read 492 Write 101 Mixed 88.6 49% 227 MB/s	4K Read 22.3 4K Write 18.8 4K Mixed 9.3 56% 16.8 MB/s	DQ Read 175 DQ Write 14.6 DQ Mixed 11.6 30% 67.1 MB/s
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 46.2% Great: 59%
Toshiba MQ01ABF050 500GB-$32 118,349 User benchmarks, average bench 43% 60GB free Firmware: AM0P1A Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing below expectations (28^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (02) Throughput performance 100 100 0 (03) Spinup time 100 100 1335 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 946 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 100 0 (08) Seek timer performance 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 96 96 1642 (0A) Spinup retry count 118 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 946 (BF) G-sense error rate 100 100 20 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 10 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 98 98 24689 (C2) HDA temperature 100 100 171799150620 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (DC) Disk shift 100 100 0 (DE) Loaded hours 99 99 785 (DF) Load/unload retry count 100 100 0 (E0) Load friction 100 100 0 (E2) Load-in time 100 100 260 (F0) Head flying hours 100 100 0	36.3% Below average	Read 63.6 Write 62.9 Mixed 60.6 47% 62.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.43 4K Write 1.29 4K Mixed 0.21 65% 0.64 MB/s
Poor: 21% ↑ This bench: 36.3% Great: 60%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Hynix HMA451S6AFR8N-TF 1x4GB 9,725 User benchmarks, average bench 36% 1 of 4 slots used 4GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing as expected (41^st percentile)	36.3% Below average	MC Read 13.7 MC Write 12.7 MC Mixed 10 35% 12.1 GB/s	SC Read 9.9 SC Write 13.2 SC Mixed 11.7 33% 11.6 GB/s	Latency 86.3 46% 86.3 ns
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 36.3% Great: 41%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Erazer X7841 MD99556 Builds (Compare 31 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 10%

Tree trunk

Desktop 56%

Gunboat

Workstation 9%

Tree trunk

System: Medion Erazer X7841 MD99556

CPU
Core i7-6700HQIntelBench 59%, 320,434 samples	16x
Core i7-6820HKIntelBench 69%, 20,362 samples	9x
Core i5-6300HQIntelBench 54%, 41,531 samples	4x

GPU
HD 530 (Mobile Skylake)IntelBench 5%, 213,495 samples	12x
GTX 970MNvidiaBench 31%, 21,995 samples	9x
GTX 1070 (Mobile)NvidiaBench 72%, 73,882 samples	7x

SSD
MZNLF128HCHP-00000 128GBSamsungBench 47%, 6,038 samples	7x
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $109Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	3x
PM981 NVMe PCIe M.2 512GBSamsungBench 217%, 80,540 samples	3x

RAM
HMA41GS6AFR8N-TF 2x8GBHynixBench 70%, 55,289 samples	8x
HyperX DDR4 2666 C15 2x8GBKingstonBench 79%, 9,568 samples	7x
HyperX DDR4 2400 C14 2x8GBKingstonBench 78%, 5,327 samples	2x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16