PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (32nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 68 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 74.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good. |
Graphics | 18.7% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 49.9% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications. |
Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 8 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager. |
Motherboard | Asrock Z68 Pro3 (all builds) |
Memory | 11.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz |
Display | 1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors, |
OS | Windows 7 |
BIOS Date | 20110713 |
Uptime | 0.1 Days |
Run Date | Jun 05 '17 at 10:37 |
Run Duration | 244 Seconds |
Run User | HRV-User |
Background CPU | 12% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
Intel Core i7-2600K-$319
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz
|
74.7%
Very good
|
|||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia GTX 560 Ti-$188
Gigabyte(1458 3515) 1GB
CLim: 900 MHz, MLim: 1002 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 382.5
|
18.7%
Very poor
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
38.9%
Below average
|
||||
Kingston HyperX 3K 240GB-$70
10GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 521ABBF0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
|
49.9%
Average
|
|||
53.1%
Above average
|
||||
37.2%
Below average
|
||||
WD My Book 25DA 4TB
246GB free, PID 25da
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
|
15.7%
Very poor
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Kingston 9905403-444.A00LF 4x4GB
4 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 1333 MHz
Performing below potential (29th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
47.7%
Average
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Core i5-2500KIntel $246Bench 66%, 143,007 samples | 171x |
Core i7-2600KIntel $319Bench 71%, 147,533 samples | 64x |
Core i5-2500IntelBench 63%, 82,538 samples | 23x |
GPU | |
---|---|
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples | 25x |
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples | 24x |
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 23x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 56% - Above average | Total price: $555 |