Asus P6T SE

Performance Results


Gaming 8% Tree trunk	Desktop 61% Destroyer	Workstation 7% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (45th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 55 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 64.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	7.77% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	35.3% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Motherboard	Asus P6T SE (all builds)
Memory	12.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display	Цвета: 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20090902
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jun 11 '17 at 16:15
Run Duration	257 Seconds
Run User	RUS-User
Background CPU	6%

PC Performing as expected (45^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-920-$90 69,074 User benchmarks, average bench 62% LGA1366, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2.65 GHz, turbo 2.75 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (76^th percentile)	64.8% Good	Memory 86.6 1-Core 69.3 2-Core 135 60% 96.8 Pts	4-Core 235 8-Core 333 36% 284 Pts	64-Core 308 19% 308 Pts
Poor: 46% ↑ This bench: 64.8% Great: 72%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 275-$250 3,083 User benchmarks, average bench 9% Device(0000 0000) 896MB Ram: 896MB, Driver: 342.1 Performing way below expectations (18^th percentile)	7.77% Terrible	Lighting 10.5 Reflection 8.42 Parallax 4.88 9% 7.93 fps	MRender 8.52 Gravity 9 Splatting 6.04 6% 7.86 fps
Poor: 8% ↑ This bench: 7.77% Great: 10%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Hitachi HTS727575A9E364 120GB 111GB free Firmware: M1009 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 120 120 0 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 492 (09) Power-on hours count 89 89 -25718264158808 (0C) Power cycle count 97 97 3075 (AB) Unknown 0 0 193 (AC) Unknown 0 0 0 (AE) Unknown 0 0 306 (B1) Unknown 0 0 2 (B5) Unknown 0 0 193 (B6) Unknown 0 0 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (C2) HDA temperature 33 41 77312098337 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 120 120 0 (C4) Reallocation count 79 79 492 (C9) Soft read error rate 120 120 0 (CC) Soft ECC correction 120 120 0 (E6) GMR head amplitude 100 100 100 (E7) Temperature 0 0 1 (E9) Unknown 0 0 7915 (EA) Unknown 0 0 6713 (F1) Unknown 0 0 6713 (F2) Unknown 0 0 8468	25.7% Poor	Read 176 Write 19.5 Mixed 37 16% 77.6 MB/s	4K Read 21.5 4K Write 19.5 4K Mixed 10.1 56% 17.1 MB/s	DQ Read 27.2 DQ Write 19.8 DQ Mixed 11.1 12% 19.4 MB/s

Kingston HyperX 3K 120GB-$100 46,066 User benchmarks, average bench 74% 20GB free (System drive) Firmware: 521ABBF0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Relative performance (0^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 95 95 16648573 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 80 80 -140265041935038 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 1495 (AB) Unknown 0 0 0 (AC) Unknown 0 0 0 (AE) Unknown 0 0 150 (B1) Unknown 0 0 3 (B5) Unknown 0 0 0 (B6) Unknown 0 0 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BD) vendor-specific 39 53 64427982887 (C2) HDA temperature 39 53 64427982887 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 120 120 16648573 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C9) Soft read error rate 120 120 16648573 (CC) Soft ECC correction 120 120 16648573 (E6) GMR head amplitude 100 100 100 (E7) Temperature 97 97 0 (E9) Unknown 0 0 27017 (EA) Unknown 0 0 14617 (F1) Unknown 0 0 14617 (F2) Unknown 0 0 12735	35.3% Below average	Read 199 Write 118 Mixed 108 31% 141 MB/s	4K Read 13.7 4K Write 47 4K Mixed 11.6 60% 24.1 MB/s	DQ Read 26.5 DQ Write 73.9 DQ Mixed 10.4 19% 36.9 MB/s
Poor: 57% ↑ This bench: 35.3% Great: 87%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 1TB-$70 337,642 User benchmarks, average bench 54% 187GB free Firmware: CC46 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing as expected (43^rd percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 115 99 86909374 (03) Spinup time 95 93 0 (04) Start/Stop count 86 86 15095 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 78 60 59119574 (09) Power-on hours count 81 81 17519 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 96 96 4750 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BC) Unknown 100 99 8590065667 (BD) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 56 48 790298668 (C2) HDA temperature 44 52 73014444076 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 25 22 86909374 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (F0) Head flying hours 100 253 -36133559826527 (F1) Unknown 100 253 3113212120 (F2) Unknown 100 253 671277688	53% Above average	Read 91.6 Write 93 Mixed 89 69% 91.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.87 4K Write 1.42 4K Mixed 0.42 109% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 34% ↑ This bench: 53% Great: 68%
WD WD800BB-88JHC0 80GB 2,880 User benchmarks, average bench 20% 11GB free Firmware: 05.01C05 Max speed: UDMA 100 100 MB/s Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 0 (03) Spinup time 167 165 2633 (04) Start/Stop count 95 95 5916 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 200 200 0 (09) Power-on hours count 83 83 12547 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 96 96 4052 (C2) HDA temperature 103 89 40 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 200 200 0	31.7% Below average	Read 54.7 Write 55.3 Mixed 54.8 41% 54.9 MB/s	4K Read 0.52 4K Write 1.56 4K Mixed 0.48 104% 0.85 MB/s
Poor: 5% ↑ This bench: 31.7% Great: 31%
WD WD1600JS-75NCB1 160GB 10,689 User benchmarks, average bench 27% 4GB free Firmware: 02.01C03 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing below expectations (24^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 0 (03) Spinup time 182 181 3883 (04) Start/Stop count 96 96 4449 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 200 200 0 (09) Power-on hours count 76 76 17777 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 97 97 3255 (BE) vendor-specific 48 44 52 (C2) HDA temperature 95 91 52 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 200 200 0	21.7% Poor	Read 36.1 Write 39 Mixed 19 23% 31.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.57 4K Write 1.71 4K Mixed 0.4 100% 0.89 MB/s
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 21.7% Great: 35%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 2x8GB 236,291 User benchmarks, average bench 64% 2 of 6 slots used 16GB DIMM Performing below potential (8^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	32% Below average	MC Read 11.7 MC Write 10 MC Mixed 9.6 30% 10.4 GB/s	SC Read 8.8 SC Write 8.6 SC Mixed 9.2 25% 8.87 GB/s	Latency 70.8 56% 70.8 ns
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 32% Great: 97%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical P6T SE Builds (Compare 1,439 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 22%

Surfboard

Desktop 69%

Battle cruiser

Workstation 18%

Surfboard

Motherboard: Asus P6T SE

CPU
Core i7-920Intel $90Bench 62%, 69,074 samples	507x
Core i7 930Intel $199Bench 64%, 19,497 samples	225x
Core i7-950Intel $100Bench 66%, 36,389 samples	190x

GPU
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	101x
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples	70x
GTX 960Nvidia $198Bench 33%, 440,282 samples	55x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	68x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	54x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	35x

RAM
6x2GBUnknownBench 46%, 38,297 samples	212x
4x4GBUnknownBench 43%, 106,178 samples	139x
6x4GBUnknownBench 47%, 28,320 samples	138x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 85% - Excellent

Total price: $177

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $274	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16