HP Compaq 100B SFF PC (Adina)

Performance Results


Gaming 2% Tree trunk	Desktop 20% Surfboard	Workstation 2% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (35th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 65 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 18.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is terrible.
Graphics	0.78% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	38.6% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (32%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	HP Compaq 100B SFF PC (Adina) (all builds)
Motherboard	Foxconn 2ACA
Memory	1.9 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20110426
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jun 12 '17 at 21:22
Run Duration	149 Seconds
Run User	ARG-User
Background CPU	32%

PC Performing below expectations (35^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD E-350 6,654 User benchmarks, average bench 25% CPU 1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 1.6 GHz, turbo 1.6 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (19^th percentile)	18.7% Very poor	Memory 32.9 1-Core 13.3 2-Core 30.2 17% 25.5 Pts	4-Core 27.3 8-Core 31.4 4% 29.3 Pts	64-Core 33.2 2% 33.2 Pts
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 18.7% Great: 36%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 6310 13,166 User benchmarks, average bench 1% HP(103C 2ACA) 384MB Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.201.1151.0 Performing as expected (59^th percentile)	0.78% Terrible	Lighting 0.9 Reflection 1.19 Parallax 1.22 1% 1.1 fps	MRender 1.19 Gravity 0.67 Splatting 1.3 1% 1.05 fps
Poor: 0% ↑ This bench: 0.78% Great: 1%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100 951,591 User benchmarks, average bench 103% 75GB free (System drive) Firmware: EMT0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below potential (0^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 99 99 6 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 3 (B1) Unknown 100 100 0 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 61 59 39 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (EB) Unknown 100 100 0 (F1) Unknown 99 99 427543790	38.6% Below average	Read 259 Write 204 Mixed 216 50% 226 MB/s	4K Read 11.8 4K Write 17.5 4K Mixed 13.6 44% 14.3 MB/s	DQ Read 48.4 DQ Write 37.4 DQ Mixed 20.3 21% 35.4 MB/s
Poor: 72% ↑ This bench: 38.6% Great: 124%
Hitachi HDS721050CLA362 500GB-$59 47,815 User benchmarks, average bench 56% 458GB free Firmware: JP2O Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing way above expectations (97^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 93 1 (02) Throughput performance 137 100 91 (03) Spinup time 115 100 17192976583 (04) Start/Stop count 99 99 6999 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 100 0 (08) Seek timer performance 140 100 30 (09) Power-on hours count 98 98 15493 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 6992 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (B9) Unknown 100 100 65535 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BC) Unknown 100 94 26749702 (BD) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 61 40 422182951 (C0) Power-off retract count 95 95 7001 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 95 95 7001 (C2) HDA temperature 153 101 257699282983 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0	74.8% Very good	Read 128 Write 133 Mixed 133 99% 131 MB/s	4K Read 0.48 4K Write 1.58 4K Mixed 0.4 94% 0.82 MB/s
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 74.8% Great: 74%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston 9905471-001.A00LF 2x2GB 663 User benchmarks, average bench 39% 2 of 2 slots used 4GB DIMM DDR3 1333 MHz Performing way below expectations (0^th percentile)	10.4% Very poor	MC Read 3.6 MC Write 3.2 MC Mixed 4.2 10% 3.67 GB/s	SC Read 2.1 SC Write 1.5 SC Mixed 2.1 5% 1.9 GB/s	Latency 238 17% 238 ns
Poor: 22% ↑ This bench: 10.4% Great: 54%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $46

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

HP Compaq 100B SFF PC (Adina)

Performance Results

PC Performing below expectations (35th percentile)

System Memory Latency Ladder

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

Feedback

PC Performing below expectations (35^th percentile)