ECS H57H-M

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 7% Tree trunk	Desktop 53% Yacht	Workstation 5% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (40th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 60 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 48.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics	14.6% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (35%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

6 years ago, 6 years ago.

Motherboard	ECS H57H-M (all builds)
Memory	11.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 0 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20100913
Uptime	0.5 Days
Run Date	Jun 15 '17 at 06:35
Run Duration	261 Seconds
Run User	IDN-User
Background CPU	35%

PC Performing below expectations (40^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i3 550-$110 19,058 User benchmarks, average bench 47% CPU 1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.15 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (63^rd percentile)	48.9% Average	Memory 65.1 1-Core 70.2 2-Core 124 52% 86.6 Pts	4-Core 189 8-Core 198 26% 194 Pts	64-Core 199 12% 199 Pts
Poor: 36% ↑ This bench: 48.9% Great: 53%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 660-$170 123,956 User benchmarks, average bench 20% Device(0000 0000) 2GB CLim: 1228 MHz, MLim: 1527 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 382.5 Relative performance (0^th percentile)	14.6% Very poor	Lighting 15.9 Reflection 14.5 Parallax 19.2 13% 16.6 fps	MRender 20.1 Gravity 23.8 Splatting 21 18% 21.6 fps
Poor: 18% ↑ This bench: 14.6% Great: 21%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
WD Blue 1TB (2010)-$39 55,121 User benchmarks, average bench 57% 369GB free (System drive) Firmware: 15.01H15 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below expectations (30^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 0 (03) Spinup time 176 173 4200 (04) Start/Stop count 95 95 5021 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 200 200 0 (09) Power-on hours count 84 84 11915 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 98 98 2668 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 491 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 199 199 4529 (C2) HDA temperature 104 89 43 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 200 200 0	50.8% Above average	Read 89.2 Write 87.6 Mixed 30.9 51% 69.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.67 4K Write 1.56 4K Mixed 0.33 93% 0.85 MB/s
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 50.8% Great: 74%
WD Green 1.5TB (2010)-$170 41,439 User benchmarks, average bench 45% 388GB free Firmware: 80.00A80 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing way below expectations (11^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 0 (03) Spinup time 166 161 8666 (04) Start/Stop count 94 94 6519 (05) Reallocated sector count 199 199 3 (07) Seek error rate 100 253 0 (09) Power-on hours count 84 84 11948 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 98 98 2591 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 386 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 170 170 90855 (C2) HDA temperature 109 96 43 (C4) Reallocation count 199 199 1 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 2 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 198 5094 (C8) Write error rate 200 200 5	29.9% Poor	Read 51.2 Write 53.2 Mixed 4.09 26% 36.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.64 4K Write 0.16 4K Mixed 0.07 37% 0.29 MB/s
Poor: 26% ↑ This bench: 29.9% Great: 63%
WD Green 1.5TB (2010)-$170 41,439 User benchmarks, average bench 45% 442GB free Firmware: 80.00A80 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing above expectations (77^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 0 (03) Spinup time 136 135 10191 (04) Start/Stop count 93 93 7236 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 200 200 0 (09) Power-on hours count 85 85 11371 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 98 98 2425 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 362 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 149 149 155515 (C2) HDA temperature 110 97 42 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 182 3353 (C8) Write error rate 200 200 0	51.3% Above average	Read 87.8 Write 91.1 Mixed 31.6 51% 70.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.44 4K Mixed 0.14 63% 0.69 MB/s
Poor: 26% ↑ This bench: 51.3% Great: 63%
Seagate Portable 320GB 786 User benchmarks, average bench 15% 28GB free, PID 2300 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed Performing as expected (44^th percentile)	14.1% Very poor	Read 31.2 Write 28.4 Mixed 12.3 29% 24 MB/s	4K Read 0.33 4K Write 1.06 4K Mixed 0.24 45% 0.54 MB/s
Poor: 10% ↑ This bench: 14.1% Great: 18%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 16GB 70,565 User benchmarks, average bench 41% 0, 0, 0, 0 MHz 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB Performing below potential (14^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	28.9% Poor	MC Read 9.4 MC Write 8.4 MC Mixed 12.8 29% 10.2 GB/s	SC Read 7.4 SC Write 6.3 SC Mixed 7.2 20% 6.97 GB/s	Latency 114 35% 114 ns
Poor: 25% ↑ This bench: 28.9% Great: 54%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16