Asus H87-PLUS

Performance Results


Gaming 19% Surfboard	Desktop 84% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 16% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (56th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 44 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 81.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	17.7% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	94.7% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (11%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

6 years ago, 6 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus H87-PLUS (all builds)
Memory	6.8 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20140728
Uptime	0.3 Days
Run Date	Jun 19 '17 at 00:34
Run Duration	165 Seconds
Run User	PER-User
Background CPU	11%

PC Performing as expected (56^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-4570-$99 129,272 User benchmarks, average bench 62% SOCKET 1150, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.45 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	81.6% Excellent	Memory 93.7 1-Core 106 2-Core 208 79% 136 Pts	4-Core 404 8-Core 395 54% 400 Pts	64-Core 400 25% 400 Pts
Poor: 46% ↑ This bench: 81.6% Great: 72%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD R9 380-$200 83,027 User benchmarks, average bench 33% MSI(1462 2015) CLim: 980 MHz, MLim: 1425 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 17.5.2 Relative performance (0^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	17.7% Very poor	Lighting 20 Reflection 23.1 Parallax 18.8 16% 20.6 fps	MRender 28.6 Gravity 20 Splatting 26.1 20% 24.9 fps
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 17.7% Great: 35%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 120GB-$80 69,224 User benchmarks, average bench 96% 45GB free (System drive) Firmware: EMT01B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below expectations (36^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 99 99 3711 (0C) Power cycle count 95 95 4654 (B1) Unknown 98 98 33 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 65 46 35 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (EB) Unknown 99 99 39 (F1) Unknown 99 99 8406200272	94.7% Outstanding	Read 506 Write 396 Mixed 412 97% 438 MB/s	4K Read 42.6 4K Write 80.7 4K Mixed 29.7 145% 51 MB/s	DQ Read 243 DQ Write 77.2 DQ Mixed 53.6 67% 125 MB/s
Poor: 64% ↑ This bench: 94.7% Great: 115%
WD WD1001FALS-41Y6A1 1TB 1,153 User benchmarks, average bench 57% 139GB free Firmware: 05.03D06 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing way below expectations (15^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 0 (03) Spinup time 177 173 4125 (04) Start/Stop count 97 97 3771 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 253 0 (09) Power-on hours count 93 93 5451 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 98 98 2733 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 112 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 199 199 3658 (C2) HDA temperature 115 99 32 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 200 200 0	42.2% Average	Read 77.1 Write 69.4 Mixed 72 55% 72.8 MB/s	4K Read 1.14 4K Write 2 4K Mixed 0.38 127% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 42.2% Great: 75%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$37 3,105,054 User benchmarks, average bench 83% 26GB free Firmware: 01.01A01 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing as expected (58^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 0 (03) Spinup time 170 167 2483 (04) Start/Stop count 97 97 3558 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 200 200 0 (09) Power-on hours count 92 92 5867 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 97 97 3050 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 130 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 199 199 3427 (C2) HDA temperature 116 99 27 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 200 200 0	87.9% Excellent	Read 176 Write 130 Mixed 130 109% 146 MB/s	4K Read 0.84 4K Write 2.17 4K Mixed 0.31 110% 1.11 MB/s
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 87.9% Great: 109%
Toshiba MK1059GSM 1TB 4,891 User benchmarks, average bench 38% 16GB free Firmware: GU001U Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing above expectations (71^st percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (02) Throughput performance 100 100 0 (03) Spinup time 100 100 3659 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 8845 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 96 (07) Seek error rate 100 100 0 (08) Seek timer performance 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 86 86 5665 (0A) Spinup retry count 253 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 7983 (BF) G-sense error rate 100 100 223165 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 109 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 70 70 304295 (C2) HDA temperature 100 100 201864642586 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 12 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (DC) Disk shift 100 100 16430 (DE) Loaded hours 92 92 3499 (DF) Load/unload retry count 100 100 0 (E0) Load friction 100 100 0 (E2) Load-in time 100 100 319 (F0) Head flying hours 100 100 0	42.3% Average	Read 69.3 Write 77.9 Mixed 74.5 56% 73.9 MB/s	4K Read 0.43 4K Write 1.46 4K Mixed 0.15 62% 0.68 MB/s
Poor: 19% ↑ This bench: 42.3% Great: 49%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Hynix HMT451U6BFR8A-PB Kingston KHX1600C10D3/8G Kingston KHX1600C9D3/4GX 12GB 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz 4096, 4096, 4096 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	50.8% Above average	MC Read 17.4 MC Write 17.9 MC Mixed 15.5 48% 16.9 GB/s	SC Read 14.2 SC Write 18.1 SC Mixed 16.2 46% 16.2 GB/s	Latency 60.5 66% 60.5 ns

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical H87-PLUS Builds (Compare 850 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 8%

Tree trunk

Desktop 66%

Battle cruiser

Workstation 7%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus H87-PLUS - $128

CPU
Core i7-4770Intel $75Bench 70%, 176,321 samples	216x
Core i5-4570Intel $99Bench 62%, 129,272 samples	145x
Core i5-4670Intel $52Bench 66%, 49,019 samples	91x

GPU
HD 4600 (Desktop 1.25 GHz)Intel $15Bench 3%, 230,189 samples	94x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	55x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	42x

SSD
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	49x
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	35x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	26x

RAM
Savage DDR3 1600 C9 2x4GBHyperXBench 51%, 78,181 samples	33x
Fury DDR3 1600 C10 2x8GBHyperXBench 54%, 77,652 samples	16x
HyperX DDR3 1600 C9 4x4GBKingstonBench 56%, 28,461 samples	14x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 62% - Good

Total price: $298

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16