| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing above expectations (83rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 17 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
| Processor | With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 74.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good. |
| Graphics | 9.02% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks. |
| Boot Drive | The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times. |
| Memory | 8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 8 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager. |
| Motherboard | Asus H110M-R (all builds) |
| Memory | 5.8 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.1 GHz |
| Display | 2560 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors |
| OS | Windows 7 |
| BIOS Date | 20160218 |
| Uptime | 0 Days |
| Run Date | Jun 19 '17 at 09:56 |
| Run Duration | 234 Seconds |
| Run User | LTU-User |
| Background CPU | 3% |
PC Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
74.2%
Very good
|
83% 145 Pts
|
43% 325 Pts
|
20% 326 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Nvidia GeForce GT 740
Gigabyte(1458 368D) 2GB
CLim: 1071 MHz, MLim: 1250 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 355.82
|
9.02%
Terrible
|
8% 10.9 fps
|
10% 12.1 fps
| |
| Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
82.4%
Excellent
|
112% 148 MB/s
|
86% 0.96 MB/s
| |
|
USB DISK 2.0 2GB
1GB free, PID 1000
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
|
7.23%
Terrible
|
13% 12.6 MB/s
|
42% 3.64 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Corsair ValueSelect DDR4 2133 C15 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
|
43.2%
Average
|
40% 14.1 GB/s
|
40% 14.2 GB/s
|
64% 62.6 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical H110M-R Builds (Compare 3,536 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: Asus H110M-R
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Core i5-7400Intel $110Bench 64%, 234,266 samples | 921x |
| Core i3-7100Intel $70Bench 57%, 79,299 samples | 373x |
| Core i7-7700Intel $167Bench 76%, 256,717 samples | 272x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 521x |
| HD 630 (Desktop Kaby Lake)IntelBench 5%, 153,031 samples | 340x |
| GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples | 302x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 84% - Excellent | Total price: $197 |