PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (21st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 79 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 51.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average. |
Graphics | 57.3% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 59.5% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications. |
Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Motherboard | Asrock Z87 Extreme6 (all builds) |
Memory | 9.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz |
Display | 3440 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20130524 |
Uptime | 1 Days |
Run Date | Jun 22 '17 at 03:08 |
Run Duration | 280 Seconds |
Run User | USA-User |
Background CPU | 65% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
Intel Core i5-4670K-$62
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 2.45 GHz (avg)
|
51.9%
Above average
|
|||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia GTX 1080-$400
CLim: 2012 MHz, MLim: 2502 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 382.5
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
57.3%
Above average
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Samsung 840 Evo 500GB-$150
193GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXT0BB0Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
|
59.5%
Above average
|
|||
63.6%
Good
|
||||
59.6%
Above average
|
||||
Generic STORAGE DEVICE 16GB
2GB free, PID 0743
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
|
10.3%
Very poor
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Corsair Dominator DDR3 2400 C10 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz
|
39.5%
Below average
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Core i7-4770KIntel $120Bench 74%, 172,887 samples | 95x |
Core i5-4670KIntel $62Bench 68%, 128,482 samples | 69x |
Core i7-4790KIntel $348Bench 79%, 455,746 samples | 25x |
GPU | |
---|---|
HD 4600 (Desktop 1.25 GHz)Intel $15Bench 3%, 230,189 samples | 24x |
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples | 22x |
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples | 21x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 61% - Good | Total price: $464 |