Performance Results


Gaming 11% Tree trunk	Desktop 51% Yacht	Workstation 8% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (60th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 40 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 44.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics	18.6% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	26% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

PC Performing above expectations (60^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core2 Quad Q6600-$100 59,658 User benchmarks, average bench 42% CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.4 GHz Performing above expectations (69^th percentile)	44.2% Average	Memory 70 1-Core 27.5 2-Core 55.4 36% 51 Pts	4-Core 109 8-Core 110 15% 109 Pts	64-Core 110 7% 110 Pts
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 44.2% Great: 50%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 750-Ti-$92 309,423 User benchmarks, average bench 17% Asus(1043 84DD) 2GB CLim: 1398 MHz, MLim: 1350 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 353.62 Performing way above expectations (96^th percentile)	18.6% Very poor	Lighting 23.4 Reflection 18 Parallax 21.2 19% 20.9 fps	MRender 26.8 Gravity 21.7 Splatting 18.4 18% 22.3 fps
Poor: 16% ↑ This bench: 18.6% Great: 19%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Pro 256GB-$125 141,929 User benchmarks, average bench 102% 40GB free (System drive) Firmware: EXM0 Relative performance (0^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	26% Poor	Read 125 Write 29.9 Mixed 54.6 15% 69.9 MB/s	4K Read 19.3 4K Write 28.8 4K Mixed 11.9 60% 20 MB/s	DQ Read 38.4 DQ Write 27.9 DQ Mixed 12.4 15% 26.2 MB/s
Poor: 71% ↑ This bench: 26% Great: 124%
Excelstor Technology J880 82GB 227 User benchmarks, average bench 23% 21GB free Firmware: PF2OA21B Max speed: UDMA 133 133 MB/s Performing above expectations (68^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (02) Throughput performance 100 100 0 (03) Spinup time 108 108 12897026233 (04) Start/Stop count 99 99 7809 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 1 (07) Seek error rate 100 100 0 (08) Seek timer performance 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 96 96 30869 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 6320 (C0) Power-off retract count 93 93 8611 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 93 93 8611 (C2) HDA temperature 141 141 261993594919 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 1 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 154	26.4% Poor	Read 49 Write 42.5 Mixed 20.2 27% 37.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.66 4K Write 1.51 4K Mixed 0.3 89% 0.82 MB/s
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 26.4% Great: 32%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 4x2GB 183,252 User benchmarks, average bench 25% 4 of 4 slots used 8GB DIMM SDRAM Performing below potential (9^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	14.3% Very poor	MC Read 3.8 MC Write 4.7 MC Mixed 3.4 11% 3.97 GB/s	SC Read 5.5 SC Write 5 SC Mixed 4.9 15% 5.13 GB/s	Latency 101 40% 101 ns
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 14.3% Great: 45%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 22%

Surfboard

Desktop 53%

Yacht

Workstation 16%

Surfboard

CPU
Core2 Quad Q6700Intel $44Bench 44%, 6,294 samples	2x
Core2 Quad Q6600Intel $100Bench 42%, 59,658 samples	2x
Core2 Duo E8400Intel $89Bench 40%, 68,540 samples	1x

Value: 30% - Poor

Total price: $475

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16