| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing above expectations (62nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 38 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
| Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 60.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average. |
| Graphics | 2.7% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times. |
| Memory | 10GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 10GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 8 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager. |
Run History
6 years ago, 6 years ago.
| System | Quanta TW9/SW9 (all builds) |
| Motherboard | Intel Base Board Product Name |
| Memory | 8 GB free of 10 GB @ 1.1 GHz |
| Display | 1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors |
| OS | Windows 7 |
| BIOS Date | 20100906 |
| Uptime | 2.6 Days |
| Run Date | Jun 24 '17 at 10:05 |
| Run Duration | 98 Seconds |
| Run User | TUR-User |
| Background CPU | 7% |
PC Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
60.2%
Good
|
60% 92.9 Pts
|
25% 196 Pts
|
14% 220 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Nvidia GeForce GT 425M
Quanta(152D 0852) 1GB
Ram: 1GB, Driver: 258.97
|
2.7%
Terrible
|
3% 3.44 fps
|
2% 3.15 fps
| |
| Drive | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
32.4%
Below average
|
40% 53.2 MB/s
|
59% 0.56 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
21.5%
Poor
|
17% 6.1 GB/s
|
20% 7.1 GB/s
|
59% 68 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical TW9/SW9 Builds (Compare 116 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
System: Quanta TW9/SW9
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Core i7 Q 740Intel $190Bench 54%, 13,278 samples | 39x |
| Core i7 Q 720Intel $220Bench 51%, 13,149 samples | 28x |
| Core i5 M 450IntelBench 40%, 8,084 samples | 10x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| GeForce GT 335MNvidiaBench 3%, 977 samples | 63x |
| GeForce GT 425MNvidiaBench 3%, 3,013 samples | 23x |
| GeForce GT 240MNvidiaBench 2%, 2,359 samples | 13x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 55% - Above average | Total price: $218 |