Gigabyte GA-X99-UD4-CF

Performance Results


Gaming 44% Speed boat	Desktop 86% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 40% Jet ski


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (42nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 58 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 83.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	44% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	55.1% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

High background CPU (27%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

6 years ago, 6 years ago.

Motherboard	Gigabyte GA-X99-UD4-CF (all builds)
Memory	9.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20141015
Uptime	16.3 Days
Run Date	Jul 04 '17 at 03:00
Run Duration	168 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	27%

PC Performing as expected (42^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-5820K-$130 101,694 User benchmarks, average bench 77% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (86^th percentile)	83.3% Excellent	Memory 93.1 1-Core 103 2-Core 198 77% 131 Pts	4-Core 397 8-Core 617 63% 507 Pts	64-Core 787 49% 787 Pts
Poor: 68% ↑ This bench: 83.3% Great: 88%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD R9 290X-$549 37,353 User benchmarks, average bench 51% MSI(1462 3080) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1030 MHz, MLim: 1250 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 17.1.1 Performing below potential (4^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	44% Average	Lighting 52.9 Reflection 49 Parallax 64.2 43% 55.4 fps	MRender 50.2 Gravity 50.6 Splatting 63.3 46% 54.7 fps
Poor: 46% ↑ This bench: 44% Great: 55%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 840 Evo 500GB-$150 68,337 User benchmarks, average bench 103% 273GB free Firmware: EXT0CB6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 99 99 1862 (0C) Power cycle count 98 98 1030 (B1) Unknown 100 100 0 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 59 56 41 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (EB) Unknown 99 99 178 (F1) Unknown 99 99 617303800	74.6% Very good	Read 496 Write 341 Mixed 355 88% 397 MB/s	4K Read 25.1 4K Write 27 4K Mixed 21.5 80% 24.5 MB/s	DQ Read 241 DQ Write 189 DQ Mixed 14.6 65% 148 MB/s
Poor: 72% ↑ This bench: 74.6% Great: 126%
OCZ Vertex 3 120GB-$42 25,948 User benchmarks, average bench 69% 18GB free (System drive) Firmware: 2.06 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (9^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 94 94 944902113244 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 97 97 77047418325779 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 1889 (AB) Unknown 0 0 0 (AC) Unknown 0 0 0 (AE) Unknown 0 0 166 (B1) Unknown 0 0 2 (B5) Unknown 0 0 0 (B6) Unknown 0 0 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (C2) HDA temperature 128 129 545469300864 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 120 120 944902113244 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C9) Soft read error rate 120 120 944902113244 (CC) Soft ECC correction 120 120 944902113244 (E6) GMR head amplitude 100 100 -76536317214620 (E7) Temperature 100 100 0 (E9) Unknown 0 0 4774 (EA) Unknown 0 0 5076 (F1) Unknown 0 0 5076 (F2) Unknown 0 0 6166	55.1% Above average	Read 497 Write 131 Mixed 191 59% 273 MB/s	4K Read 23.5 4K Write 56 4K Mixed 11.2 80% 30.2 MB/s	DQ Read 68.1 DQ Write 125 DQ Mixed 26.7 40% 73.4 MB/s
Poor: 53% ↑ This bench: 55.1% Great: 82%
Toshiba DT01ACA200 2TB-$50 344,862 User benchmarks, average bench 86% 2TB free Firmware: MX4OABB0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way above expectations (95^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (02) Throughput performance 141 141 66 (03) Spinup time 127 127 21494497577 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 1293 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 100 0 (08) Seek timer performance 124 124 33 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 1683 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 974 (C0) Power-off retract count 99 99 1293 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 99 99 1293 (C2) HDA temperature 171 171 193274052643 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 1	108% Outstanding	Read 186 Write 189 Mixed 175 138% 183 MB/s	4K Read 0.92 4K Write 1.98 4K Mixed 0.24 102% 1.05 MB/s
Poor: 49% ↑ This bench: 108% Great: 108%
WD Blue 640GB (2008)-$33 94,563 User benchmarks, average bench 50% 154GB free Firmware: 01.03B01 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing below expectations (29^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 0 (03) Spinup time 164 157 4783 (04) Start/Stop count 97 97 3686 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 253 0 (09) Power-on hours count 94 94 4669 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 98 98 2233 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 658 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 199 199 3684 (C2) HDA temperature 109 96 38 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 200 200 0	43.4% Average	Read 74.5 Write 76.4 Mixed 65 54% 71.9 MB/s	4K Read 0.46 4K Write 1.87 4K Mixed 0.38 96% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 43.4% Great: 62%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Crucial Ballistix Sport DDR4 2400 C16 4x4GB-$84 1,914 User benchmarks, average bench 97% 4 of 8 slots used 16GB DIMM clocked @ 2400 MHz Performing above expectations (67^th percentile)	100% Outstanding	MC Read 38.5 MC Write 40.9 MC Mixed 36.3 110% 38.6 GB/s	SC Read 15 SC Write 18.6 SC Mixed 20.7 52% 18.1 GB/s	Latency 61.9 65% 61.9 ns
Poor: 71% ↑ This bench: 100% Great: 108%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical GA-X99-UD4-CF Builds (Compare 802 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 47%

Yacht

Desktop 86%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 42%

Speed boat

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-X99-UD4-CF

CPU
Core i7-5820KIntel $130Bench 77%, 101,694 samples	426x
Core i7-5930KIntel $70Bench 80%, 34,039 samples	116x
Core i7-6800KIntel $78Bench 81%, 50,196 samples	58x

GPU
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples	84x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	51x
GTX 1080Nvidia $400Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	49x

SSD
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 276%, 367,854 samples	23x
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $109Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	21x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	21x

RAM
Ballistix Sport DDR4 2400 C16 4x4GBCrucial $84Bench 97%, 1,914 samples	20x
16ATF1G64AZ-2G1A1 2x8GBMicronBench 68%, 1,302 samples	15x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 2666 C16 4x4GBCorsair $115Bench 88%, 5,380 samples	14x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 80% - Excellent

Total price: $457

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $15	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16