QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996)

Performance Results


Gaming 34% Sail boat	Desktop 84% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 33% Sail boat


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (65th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 35 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 79.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	38.6% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	54.8% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	7.81GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 7.81GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (14%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996) (all builds)
Motherboard
Memory	5.1 GB free of 7.8125 GB @ 0 GHz
Display	1024 x 768 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20140401
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jul 10 '17 at 03:21
Run Duration	210 Seconds
Run User	CAN-User
Background CPU	14%

PC Performing above expectations (65^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Opteron 63xx class CPU 55 User benchmarks, average bench 51% CPU 0, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 8 threads Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (94^th percentile)	79.5% Very good	Memory 78.6 1-Core 120 2-Core 227 79% 142 Pts	4-Core 430 8-Core 925 79% 678 Pts	64-Core 902 56% 902 Pts
Poor: 25% ↑ This bench: 79.5% Great: 79%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD R9 290-$399 68,699 User benchmarks, average bench 46% PwrHis(1787 2020) ≥ 4GB CLim: 947 MHz, MLim: 1250 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 16.11.5 Performing below potential (5^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	38.6% Below average	Lighting 40.9 Reflection 49.3 Parallax 66.7 33% 52.3 fps	MRender 55 Gravity 49.4 Splatting 70.2 49% 58.2 fps
Poor: 41% ↑ This bench: 38.6% Great: 50%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Qemu HARDDISK 2TB 24 User benchmarks, average bench 65% 210GB free Firmware: 2.5+ Max speed: SATA 1.0 150 MB/s Relative performance (0^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (03) Spinup time 100 100 16 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 100 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 1 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 69 69 522125343	11.1% Very poor	Read 87.3 Write 118 Mixed 96.4 23% 100 MB/s	4K Read 0.45 4K Write 1.24 4K Mixed 0.24 2% 0.64 MB/s
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 11.1% Great: 80%
Qemu HARDDISK 256GB 45 User benchmarks, average bench 51% 90GB free (System drive) Firmware: 2.5+ Max speed: SATA 1.0 150 MB/s Performing above expectations (71^st percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (03) Spinup time 100 100 16 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 100 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 1 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 69 69 522125343	54.8% Above average	Read 386 Write 331 Mixed 349 79% 355 MB/s	4K Read 14.6 4K Write 20.5 4K Mixed 16.1 54% 17.1 MB/s	DQ Read 59.2 DQ Write 50.2 DQ Mixed 7.38 18% 38.9 MB/s
Poor: 34% ↑ This bench: 54.8% Great: 79%
Qemu HARDDISK 90GB 10GB free Firmware: 2.5+ Max speed: SATA 1.0 150 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (03) Spinup time 100 100 16 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 100 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 1 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 69 69 522125343	29.3% Poor	Read 210 Write 90.3 Mixed 99.9 29% 133 MB/s	4K Read 13.7 4K Write 23.4 4K Mixed 8.16 44% 15.1 MB/s	DQ Read 59.3 DQ Write 54 DQ Mixed 27.7 29% 47 MB/s

Qemu HARDDISK 750GB 2 User benchmarks, average bench 52% 335GB free Firmware: 2.5+ Max speed: SATA 1.0 150 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (03) Spinup time 100 100 16 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 100 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 1 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 69 69 522125343	44.3% Average	Read 66 Write 88.6 Mixed 63.7 54% 72.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.47 4K Write 0.71 4K Mixed 0.2 55% 0.46 MB/s
Poor: 44% ↑ This bench: 44.3% Great: 59%
Qemu HARDDISK 750GB 2 User benchmarks, average bench 52% 477GB free Firmware: 2.5+ Max speed: SATA 1.0 150 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (03) Spinup time 100 100 16 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 100 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 1 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 69 69 522125343	37.2% Below average	Read 67.1 Write 62.6 Mixed 54.1 46% 61.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.39 4K Write 0.54 4K Mixed 0.18 46% 0.37 MB/s
Poor: 44% ↑ This bench: 37.2% Great: 59%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
QEMU 1x7GB 828 User benchmarks, average bench 69% 1 of 1 slots used 7GB DIMM RAM Performing way above expectations (91^st percentile)	106% Outstanding	MC Read 43.1 MC Write 39.9 MC Mixed 35.9 113% 39.6 GB/s	SC Read 21 SC Write 34.8 SC Mixed 28.7 80% 28.2 GB/s	Latency 83.2 48% 83.2 ns
Poor: 25% ↑ This bench: 106% Great: 121%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996) Builds (Compare 94 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 124%

UFO

Desktop 103%

UFO

Workstation 127%

UFO

System: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996)

CPU
Gen Intel Core i7-12700K12thBench 99%, 67 samples	5x
Ryzen Threadripper 3960X 24-CoreAMDBench 85%, 74 samples	4x
Ryzen 7 3700X 8-CoreAMDBench 76%, 455 samples	4x

GPU
GTX 1080-TiNvidia $499Bench 124%, 840,268 samples	8x
RTX 3060-TiNvidia $340Bench 128%, 442,467 samples	7x
RTX 3070Nvidia $400Bench 148%, 619,642 samples	5x

SSD
Force NVMe PCIe M.2 960GBCorsairBench 230%, 32,020 samples	4x
SM841 mSATA 256GBSamsungBench 79%, 1,284 samples	3x
HARDDISK 86GBQemuBench 42%, 75 samples	3x

RAM
1x16GBQEMUBench 91%, 3,887 samples	22x
2x16GBQEMUBench 108%, 1,370 samples	11x
1x8GBQEMUBench 78%, 5,342 samples	11x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 59% - Above average

Total price: $499

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $132	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $186	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $34	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16