Lenovo 309396U

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 1%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 31%
Sail boat
Workstation
Workstation 1%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (48th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 52 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 35.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics0.69% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 8 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Run History
6 years ago, 5 years ago.
SystemLenovo 309396U  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO 309396U
Memory1.5 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1280 x 800 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20101217
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateJul 13 '17 at 17:14
Run Duration598 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing as expected (48th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7 L 640
None, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.15 GHz
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
35.1% Below average
Memory 57.5
1-Core 29.5
2-Core 58.6
32% 48.5 Pts
4-Core 76.4
8-Core 73.8
10% 75.1 Pts
64-Core 70.4
4% 70.4 Pts
Poor: 32%
This bench: 35.1%
Great: 45%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD Graphics (Arrandale 0.667/0.766 GHz)
Legend(17AA 215A) 1.2GB
Driver: igdumdx32.dll Ver. 8.15.10.2622
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
0.69% Terrible
Lighting 0.77
Reflection 0.85
Parallax 0.75
1% 0.79 fps
MRender 1.19
Gravity 0.57
Splatting 1.22
1% 0.99 fps
Poor: 0%
This bench: 0.69%
Great: 1%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Black 2.5" 320GB (2010)-$45
216GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1A02 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
57.3% Above average
Read 106
Write 93.8
Mixed 94.1
74% 97.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.33
4K Write 1.61
4K Mixed 0.35
83% 0.76 MB/s
Poor: 21%
This bench: 57.3%
Great: 60%
Seagate BUP Slim BK 1TB
836GB free, PID ab26
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
17.3% Very poor
Read 23.4
Write 20
Mixed 19.2
26% 20.8 MB/s
4K Read 1.15
4K Write 3.02
4K Mixed 0.48
123% 1.55 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 17.3%
Great: 52%
USB Flash Drive 32GB
26GB free, PID 5598
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
11.3% Very poor
Read 25.3
Write 7.87
Mixed 13.2
17% 15.4 MB/s
4K Read 3.04
4K Write 1.69
4K Mixed 0.9
99% 1.88 MB/s
Poor: 6%
This bench: 11.3%
Great: 15%
Lexar USB Flash Drive 32GB
26GB free, PID 0803
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
10.4% Very poor
Read 24.8
Write 19.1
Mixed 8.68
20% 17.5 MB/s
4K Read 2.83
4K Write 0.65
4K Mixed 0.5
50% 1.33 MB/s
Poor: 10%
This bench: 10.4%
Great: 35%
SanDisk Cruzer Glide 32GB
25GB free, PID 5575
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
13.3% Very poor
Read 25.2
Write 10.6
Mixed 9.84
16% 15.2 MB/s
4K Read 3.69
4K Write 2.11
4K Mixed 1.22
127% 2.34 MB/s
Poor: 6%
This bench: 13.3%
Great: 19%
SanDisk Ultra USB 3.0 32GB-$8
25GB free, PID 5581
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
12.8% Very poor
Read 25.2
Write 12.2
Mixed 16.3
21% 17.9 MB/s
4K Read 3.63
4K Write 1.84
4K Mixed 1.08
113% 2.18 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 12.8%
Great: 38%
Generic- Multi-Card 16GB
11GB free, PID 0159
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
13.9% Very poor
Read 18.4
Write 17.5
Mixed 16.5
22% 17.5 MB/s
4K Read 3.92
4K Write 2.11
4K Mixed 1.5
137% 2.51 MB/s
Poor: 4%
This bench: 13.9%
Great: 13%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial CT51264BF160B.C16F 2x4GB
2 of 2 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR3 1600 MHz
Performing below expectations (30th percentile)
22.6% Poor
MC Read 7.9
MC Write 6.5
MC Mixed 9.4
23% 7.93 GB/s
SC Read 5.6
SC Write 4.4
SC Mixed 5.7
15% 5.23 GB/s
Latency 135
30% 135 ns
Poor: 16%
This bench: 22.6%
Great: 57%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback