Asus P8H67-M PRO

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 38%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 80%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 29%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (33rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 67 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 74%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics50.1% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive46.5% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsus P8H67-M PRO  (all builds)
Memory13.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit cores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130427
Uptime0.6 Days
Run DateJul 19 '17 at 05:23
Run Duration279 Seconds
Run User BRA-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-2600K-$319
LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
74% Very good
Memory 90.9
1-Core 96.5
2-Core 186
73% 125 Pts
4-Core 362
8-Core 181
40% 271 Pts
64-Core 471
29% 471 Pts
Poor: 56%
This bench: 74%
Great: 83%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 970-$200
EVGA(3842 2977) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1506 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 384.76
Performing below potential (66th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
50.1% Above average
Lighting 62.6
Reflection 70
Parallax 61.7
51% 64.8 fps
MRender 56.9
Gravity 60.3
Splatting 59.4
48% 58.8 fps
Poor: 43%
This bench: 50.1%
Great: 54%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SanDisk Extreme II 240GB-$110
54GB free (System drive)
Firmware: R1311 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Relative performance (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
46.5% Average
Read 216
Write 220
Mixed 214
48% 217 MB/s
4K Read 21.4
4K Write 45.9
4K Mixed 13.7
74% 27 MB/s
DQ Read 27.6
DQ Write 88.4
DQ Mixed 15.2
24% 43.8 MB/s
Poor: 65%
This bench: 46.5%
Great: 109%
ST4000DM 001-1FK17N 4TB
619GB free, PID 0539
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
21.5% Poor
Read 30.1
Write 19.8
Mixed 24.4
30% 24.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 4.11
4K Mixed 0.45
158% 1.72 MB/s
Poor: 21%
This bench: 21.5%
Great: 47%
ST3000DM 001-1CH166 3TB
474GB free, PID 0539
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
13.3% Very poor
Read 31.6
Write 26.4
Mixed 28.8
36% 28.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.35
4K Write 0.94
4K Mixed 0.21
40% 0.5 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 13.3%
Great: 69%
ST4000DM 000-1F2168 4TB
320GB free, PID 0539
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
14.7% Very poor
Read 32
Write 26.4
Mixed 28.6
36% 29 MB/s
4K Read 0.41
4K Write 1.39
4K Mixed 0.16
54% 0.65 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 14.7%
Great: 59%
ST1000DM 000-9TS15E 1TB
104GB free, PID 0539
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
14.7% Very poor
Read 30.6
Write 26
Mixed 28.9
36% 28.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.51
4K Write 1.45
4K Mixed 0.29
61% 0.75 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 14.7%
Great: 15%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance DDR3 1600 C10 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 1333 MHz
Performing below potential (3rd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
28.5% Poor
MC Read 9.1
MC Write 8.6
MC Mixed 8.3
25% 8.67 GB/s
SC Read 8.9
SC Write 9.9
SC Mixed 8.7
26% 9.17 GB/s
Latency 65.8
61% 65.8 ns
Poor: 33%
This bench: 28.5%
Great: 62%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical P8H67-M PRO Builds (Compare 949 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus P8H67-M PRO

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 67% - Good Total price: $225
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback