Biostar TH55 HD

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 27%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 22%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (46th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 54 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 71.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics33.7% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive41% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardBiostar TH55 HD  (all builds)
Memory3.8 GB free of 8 GB @ 0 GHz
Display1600 x 900 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20100615
Uptime1 Days
Run DateJul 22 '17 at 04:05
Run Duration446 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing as expected (46th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7 860-$339
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 3 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
71.8% Very good
Memory 95.4
1-Core 88.6
2-Core 170
71% 118 Pts
4-Core 262
8-Core 386
40% 324 Pts
64-Core 388
24% 388 Pts
Poor: 53%
This bench: 71.8%
Great: 72%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD R9 380-$200
CLim: 980 MHz, MLim: 1425 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 17.7.1
Performing below potential (79th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
33.7% Below average
Lighting 42.1
Reflection 48.4
Parallax 51
34% 47.2 fps
MRender 48.2
Gravity 38
Splatting 34.9
32% 40.4 fps
Poor: 31%
This bench: 33.7%
Great: 35%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SanDisk Ultra II 240GB-$40
47GB free
Firmware: X31200RL Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below potential (1st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
47.6% Average
Read 239
Write 180
Mixed 176
44% 198 MB/s
4K Read 16.5
4K Write 38.7
4K Mixed 16.3
66% 23.8 MB/s
DQ Read 190
DQ Write 120
DQ Mixed 50.3
66% 120 MB/s
Poor: 58%
This bench: 47.6%
Great: 101%
PNY CS1311 120GB-$63
11GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CS131122 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below potential (2nd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
41% Average
Read 263
Write 183
Mixed 186
47% 211 MB/s
4K Read 15.7
4K Write 28.1
4K Mixed 9.05
50% 17.6 MB/s
DQ Read 99.4
DQ Write 103
DQ Mixed 43.1
48% 81.9 MB/s
Poor: 48%
This bench: 41%
Great: 91%
PNY CS1311 120GB-$63
3GB free
Firmware: CS131122 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below potential (4th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
45.2% Average
Read 263
Write 184
Mixed 186
47% 211 MB/s
4K Read 15.7
4K Write 38
4K Mixed 9.01
56% 20.9 MB/s
DQ Read 203
DQ Write 131
DQ Mixed 42.5
65% 126 MB/s
Poor: 48%
This bench: 45.2%
Great: 91%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 500GB-$36
112GB free
Firmware: CC46 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
43.1% Average
Read 71.9
Write 78.2
Mixed 62.2
53% 70.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.66
4K Write 1.35
4K Mixed 0.44
101% 0.82 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 43.1%
Great: 70%
Samsung HD322GJ 320GB
68GB free
Firmware: 1AR10001 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
82.1% Excellent
Read 138
Write 148
Mixed 124
102% 137 MB/s
4K Read 0.59
4K Write 2.61
4K Mixed 0.47
125% 1.22 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 82.1%
Great: 81%
Seagate ST3160212SCE 160GB
60GB free
Firmware: 3.ACF Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
21.2% Poor
Read 36.6
Write 37.2
Mixed 35.6
27% 36.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 0.88
4K Mixed 0.28
64% 0.52 MB/s
Poor: 8%
This bench: 21.2%
Great: 39%
Samsung Camcorder 16GB
13GB free, PID 1238
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
6.28% Terrible
Read 10.7
Write 3.88
Mixed 5.56
7% 6.71 MB/s
4K Read 2.12
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 0.75
71% 1.32 MB/s
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 8GB
0, 0 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
43.1% Average
MC Read 18.4
MC Write 12.4
MC Mixed 11.6
40% 14.1 GB/s
SC Read 12.8
SC Write 11.6
SC Mixed 12.8
35% 12.4 GB/s
Latency 56
72% 56 ns
Poor: 20%
This bench: 43.1%
Great: 51%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TH55 HD Builds (Compare 15 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 18%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 14%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Biostar TH55 HD

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 44% - Average Total price: $293
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $274Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback