Asus H87M-PRO

Performance Results


Gaming 27% Raft	Desktop 80% Battleship	Workstation 22% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (54th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 46 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 75.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	30.7% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	41.9% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (13%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

6 years ago, 6 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus H87M-PRO (all builds)
Memory	5.2 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20141028
Uptime	7.4 Days
Run Date	Jul 23 '17 at 21:56
Run Duration	132 Seconds
Run User	GBR-User
Background CPU	13%

Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (54^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-4440-$128 81,111 User benchmarks, average bench 61% SOCKET 1150, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	75.8% Very good	Memory 91.3 1-Core 91.4 2-Core 176 71% 120 Pts	4-Core 350 8-Core 346 47% 348 Pts	64-Core 363 22% 363 Pts
Poor: 45% ↑ This bench: 75.8% Great: 70%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59 946,701 User benchmarks, average bench 29% Zotac(19DA A454) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1923 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 384.76 Performing way above expectations (85^th percentile)	30.7% Below average	Lighting 38.4 Reflection 29.8 Parallax 37.2 31% 35.1 fps	MRender 37.7 Gravity 37.1 Splatting 34.4 30% 36.4 fps
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 30.7% Great: 33%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Crucial BX200 240GB-$36 36,559 User benchmarks, average bench 76% 78GB free Firmware: MU01.4 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (11^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 312 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 377 (A0) Unknown 100 100 0 (A1) Unknown 100 100 20 (A3) Unknown 100 100 359 (94) Unknown 100 100 39205 (95) Unknown 100 100 585 (96) Unknown 100 100 421 (97) Unknown 100 100 569 (A4) Unknown 100 100 14165 (A5) Unknown 100 100 23 (A6) Unknown 100 100 2 (A7) Unknown 100 100 11 (A9) Unknown 100 100 99 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 13 (C2) HDA temperature 100 100 33123343269910 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 1 (E8) Unknown 100 100 100 (F1) Unknown 100 100 58434 (F2) Unknown 100 100 80000 (F5) Unknown 100 100 83662 (F6) Unknown 100 100 78410 (F7) Unknown 100 100 0	59.6% Above average	Read 446 Write 255 Mixed 268 71% 323 MB/s	4K Read 19.4 4K Write 28.3 4K Mixed 9.57 57% 19.1 MB/s	DQ Read 265 DQ Write 174 DQ Mixed 9.24 64% 149 MB/s
Poor: 55% ↑ This bench: 59.6% Great: 91%
Samsung 840 250GB-$251 41,998 User benchmarks, average bench 70% 29GB free (System drive) Firmware: DXT08B0Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (0^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 99 99 3795 (0C) Power cycle count 98 98 1366 (B1) Unknown 96 96 46 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 74 64 26 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 99 99 180 (EB) Unknown 99 99 30 (F1) Unknown 99 99 13897149458	41.9% Average	Read 405 Write 76.9 Mixed 106 42% 196 MB/s	4K Read 17.6 4K Write 44.9 4K Mixed 9.06 62% 23.9 MB/s	DQ Read 21.8 DQ Write 118 DQ Mixed 9.15 25% 49.5 MB/s
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 41.9% Great: 85%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Corsair Vengeance LP DDR3 1600 C9 2x4GB 27,024 User benchmarks, average bench 50% 2 of 4 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing above expectations (71^st percentile)	52.7% Above average	MC Read 18.4 MC Write 18.1 MC Mixed 17.1 51% 17.9 GB/s	SC Read 15 SC Write 16.8 SC Mixed 17.7 47% 16.5 GB/s	Latency 65.2 61% 65.2 ns
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 52.7% Great: 63%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical H87M-PRO Builds (Compare 393 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 8%

Tree trunk

Desktop 65%

Destroyer

Workstation 7%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus H87M-PRO - $121

CPU
Core i7-4770Intel $75Bench 70%, 176,321 samples	75x
Core i5-4570Intel $99Bench 62%, 129,272 samples	49x
Core i5-4670Intel $52Bench 66%, 49,019 samples	48x

GPU
HD 4600 (Desktop 1.25 GHz)Intel $15Bench 3%, 230,189 samples	35x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	26x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	25x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	17x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	12x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	11x

RAM
Savage DDR3 1600 C9 2x4GBHyperXBench 51%, 78,181 samples	19x
HyperX DDR3 2133 C11 2x8GBKingstonBench 61%, 11,630 samples	9x
Fury DDR3 1866 C10 2x8GBHyperXBench 59%, 122,541 samples	8x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 75% - Very good

Total price: $239

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16