PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (37th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 63 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 62.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average. |
Graphics | 31.5% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 44.3% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications. |
Memory | 24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Motherboard | Gigabyte GA-X58A-UD3R (all builds) |
Memory | 17.1 GB free of 24 GB @ 0.8 GHz |
Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20110218 |
Uptime | 5 Days |
Run Date | Jul 25 '17 at 19:40 |
Run Duration | 160 Seconds |
Run User | ARE-User |
Background CPU | 9% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
Intel Core i7 960-$220
Socket 1366, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.15 GHz (avg)
|
62.4%
Good
|
|||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia GTX 950-$100
CLim: 1569 MHz, MLim: 1652 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 384.76
|
31.5%
Below average
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
187GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT01B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
|
44.3%
Average
|
|||
62.7%
Good
|
||||
42.1%
Average
|
||||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Unknown 24GB
null MHz
4096, 4096, 8192, 8192 MB
|
29.7%
Poor
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Core i7-950Intel $100Bench 66%, 36,389 samples | 627x |
Core i7 930Intel $199Bench 64%, 19,497 samples | 405x |
Core i7 960Intel $220Bench 68%, 16,233 samples | 217x |
GPU | |
---|---|
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 148x |
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples | 104x |
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples | 102x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 87% - Excellent | Total price: $397 |