Asrock Z270M Extreme4

Performance Results


Gaming 77% Battleship	Desktop 92% Nuclear submarine	Workstation 61% Destroyer


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (67th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 33 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 89.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	83.4% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	82.4% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (12%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago. (Only the first run influences device rankings)

Motherboard	Asrock Z270M Extreme4 (all builds)
Memory	21.2 GB free of 24 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20170214
Uptime	0.7 Days
Run Date	Jul 31 '17 at 16:19
Run Duration	140 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	12%

Watch Gameplay: 1070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing above expectations (67^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-7600K-$190 195,006 User benchmarks, average bench 76% CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (96^th percentile)	89.3% Excellent	Memory 90.1 1-Core 130 2-Core 259 89% 160 Pts	4-Core 511 8-Core 511 68% 511 Pts	64-Core 514 32% 514 Pts
Poor: 59% ↑ This bench: 89.3% Great: 89%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$132 1,459,281 User benchmarks, average bench 80% Nvidia(10DE 119D) CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 384.94 Performing below potential (79^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	83.4% Excellent	Lighting 104 Reflection 116 Parallax 98 85% 106 fps	MRender 97.6 Gravity 96.2 Splatting 100 80% 98.1 fps
Poor: 71% ↑ This bench: 83.4% Great: 88%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
PNY CS1311 240GB-$78 26,547 User benchmarks, average bench 81% 159GB free (System drive) Firmware: CS131122 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing as expected (47^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 1703 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 338 (A8) Unknown 100 100 0 (AA) Unknown 100 100 146 (AD) Unknown 100 100 393235 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 21 (C2) HDA temperature 70 70 128850984990 (DA) Unknown 100 100 0 (E7) Temperature 100 100 100 (F1) Unknown 100 100 2784	82.4% Excellent	Read 517 Write 355 Mixed 358 91% 410 MB/s	4K Read 33.4 4K Write 75.6 4K Mixed 10.1 104% 39.7 MB/s	DQ Read 262 DQ Write 233 DQ Mixed 41.5 88% 179 MB/s
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 82.4% Great: 97%
PNY CS1311 240GB-$78 26,547 User benchmarks, average bench 81% 127GB free Firmware: CS131122 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below expectations (34^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 6517 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 1822 (A8) Unknown 100 100 0 (AA) Unknown 100 100 445 (AD) Unknown 100 100 1769524 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 302 (C2) HDA temperature 70 70 128850984990 (DA) Unknown 100 100 0 (E7) Temperature 100 100 73 (F1) Unknown 100 100 5444	78.2% Very good	Read 516 Write 357 Mixed 352 90% 408 MB/s	4K Read 33.8 4K Write 79 4K Mixed 10.1 106% 41 MB/s	DQ Read 34.4 DQ Write 238 DQ Mixed 42.1 60% 105 MB/s
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 78.2% Great: 97%
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016)-$51 462,780 User benchmarks, average bench 92% 2TB free Firmware: CC26 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing above expectations (79^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 120 99 237284048 (03) Spinup time 96 96 0 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 270 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 65 60 3631361 (09) Power-on hours count 99 99 1597 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 266 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BC) Unknown 100 100 0 (BD) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 70 63 521338910 (BF) G-sense error rate 100 100 0 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 6 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 100 100 607 (C2) HDA temperature 30 40 47244640286 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (F0) Head flying hours 100 253 17811229378098 (F1) Unknown 100 253 2636105293 (F2) Unknown 100 253 41524637055	105% Outstanding	Read 191 Write 176 Mixed 180 138% 183 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.53 4K Mixed 0.19 78% 0.81 MB/s
Poor: 63% ↑ This bench: 105% Great: 114%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 8GBF2X04HEEE36-12-K 01BA 8GBF2X04HEEE36-12-K 859B BLS8G4D240FSB.16FADG 24GB 4 User benchmarks, average bench 61% 2133, 2133, 2133 MHz 8192, 8192, 8192 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	73.8% Very good	MC Read 26.9 MC Write 28.3 MC Mixed 22.2 74% 25.8 GB/s	SC Read 16.8 SC Write 28.8 SC Mixed 25.2 67% 23.6 GB/s	Latency 67.1 60% 67.1 ns
Poor: 42% ↑ This bench: 73.8% Great: 75%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Z270M Extreme4 Builds (Compare 225 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 88%

Aircraft carrier

Desktop 93%

Nuclear submarine

Workstation 75%

Battleship

Motherboard: Asrock Z270M Extreme4

CPU
Core i7-7700KIntel $241Bench 84%, 712,312 samples	73x
Core i7-6700KIntel $180Bench 81%, 588,978 samples	50x
Core i7-7700Intel $167Bench 76%, 256,717 samples	23x

GPU
GTX 1080Nvidia $400Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	26x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	21x
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	19x

SSD
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 276%, 367,854 samples	15x
P2 3D NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBCrucial $45Bench 166%, 55,360 samples	13x
PM961 NVMe PCIe M.2 256GBSamsungBench 177%, 99,566 samples	7x

RAM
2x8GBUnknownBench 64%, 236,291 samples	12x
Vengeance RGB PRO DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $63Bench 85%, 346,786 samples	8x
HyperX 2400 C15 1x16GBKingstonBench 44%, 13,141 samples	8x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 73% - Very good

Total price: $684

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16